Gu Liang Is Good At Interpretation:the Study Of Gu Liang In Oing Dynasty Which Centered On Four Literatures

Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan is one of the thirteen classic works.However,since a brief period of praise during the Han Xuan Emperor,few people have studied this book again.After the middle of Qing Dynasty,the study of Gu Liang Zhuan was just rising again.The important research works are as follows:The Explanatory Specimens of Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan's ShiYue Ri,??????????????The Textual Research of Gu Liang Zhuan's Etiquette,??????The Additional Annotations of Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan,??????????The Meaning Interpretation of Gu Liang Zhuan,???????and so on."Gu Liang is good at interpretation"(?????)was raised by the Famous scholar Zheng Xuan of the Han Dynasty.This old statement was re-discovery and re-interpretation in the Qing Dynasty,which plays an important role in the revitalization and development of Gu Liang study.The first chapter of this article is in order to investigate and verify the relationship between the Zheng Xuan's statement and the development of Gu Liang study.With the rise of Zheng Xuan's academic status in the Qing Dynasty,the Gu Liang scholars misinterpreted "Gu Liang is good at interpretation" as Gu Liang is better at interpreting the classics than Zuo Zhuan and Gong Yang.They even thought that only Gu Liang explains the true meaning of the Chuan Qiu.This misinterpreting not only promots the rise of the Qing Dynasty's Gu Liang learning,but also runs through the learning.In the study of Confucian classics,examples and meaning are the two most important points.That's why the Gu Liang scholars also paid particular attention to them.The second chapter of this article is about Xu Guilin's the Explanatory Specimens of Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan's ShiYue Ri.Xu Guilin thought that Chun Qiu must had some "Writing norms"(??).There must be some certain reasons for whether write the time or not.This is also the premise that Chun Qiu can be the classics.Otherwise it would be just a history book.Xu Guilin reinterpreted the terms such as "the positive case",(??)"the normal case",(??)"No positive case",(????)"the variation case"(??)and so on.On this basis,he also tried to reconstruction the Confucian classics.This also suggests that the purpose of Xu Guilin wrote the book is to refute and correct the academic atmosphere which using history to prove Confucian classics in the Qianjia period.He also hoped that the scholars would respect the classics more than doubt the classics.Despite the fact that The Explanatory Specimens of Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan's ShiYue Ri and The Meaning Interpretation of Gu Liang Zhuan are both about the Gu Liang of the month and the moon.Through the comparison we can find that the two books are quite different.First,Xu Guilin focused on the special case,in order to refute the hiatus theory.Liu Xingen centered on the reconstruction of Gu Liang learning system,so whether it is a "special case" or "positive example" are both the core of the exposition.Secondly,Xu Guilin wanted to explore the attitude of Confucius.Liu Xingen tried to construct the rule of the feudal princes which is advocated by ConfuciusIn addition,The Textual Research of Gu Liang Zhuan's Etiquette is the small posthumous work of Hou Kang,but it is very important.In the third chapter,By studying this book I found that Hou Kang's purpose of writing is not only to explore the Social rites in the text,but also hope to achieve the current use.Particularly achieved the classic "ritual" and the reality "ritual" between the combination and interaction.However,Hou Kang's academic path tend to be historical textual research,Gu Liang Chuan itself is focused on the theory of Confucian classics.There is a contradiction between Hou Kang's academic and the attribute of Gu Liang Chuan,Which caused The Textual Research of Gu Liang Zhuan's Etiquette to swing between the classics and history in the writing process.In fact,Hou Kang failed to finish the book,not only because of his untimely death,but also the choice of his academic path And this paper makes a comparison between the Textual Research of Gu Liang Zhuan's Etiquette and the Meaning Interpretation of Gu Liang Zhuan.I found that the starting point of the latter lies in the research of Gu Liang's rituals and ceremonies,which then seek the meaning of Confucius' Chun Qiu.However the purpose of the former lies in the book's practical help.The difference between the two books,resulting in their respective selection of different entries to explain as well as different understanding of them.Zhong Wen Zheng's the Additional Annotations of Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan is one of the most important books which made a full-text annotated works to the Gu Liang Chuan.It can be regarded as the most comprehensive,the most in-depth and the most classic research work on Gu Liang study in the Qing Dynasty.The fourth chapter of this article is centered on Zhong Wen Zheng's explanation of "Gu Liang is good at interpretation".Through the comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of Gu Liang,Gong Yang,Zuo Zhuan.Zhong Wen Zheng believes that Gu Liang's interpretation is the most correct.In the interpretation of Zhong Wen Zheng's system,"Gu Liang is good at interpretation" turned into "Gu Liang is the most good at interpretation".The famous Gu Liang scholar Fan Ning who mixed three books to explain Chun Qiu must bound to be denied by Zhong Wen Zheng.Zhong Wen Zheng proposed to take Gu Liang as the center to judge other works.This concept runs through the book and also get a great development of Guliang study in Qing Dynasty.Liu Xingen's the Meaning Interpretation of Gu Liang Zhuan was the first one who attempted to construct a complete system of Gu Liang learning.The fifth chapter of this paper is the study of this book.First,from the view of edition bibliography,I found that the thirty volumes of the current version is Liu Xingen's Original work.Liu didn't write one hundred volumes the General meaning of Chun Qiu Gu Liang Zhuan.There is not a big loss either.The "explanation was called hiatus"(???)in the current version were added by the trimmers who do not understand the book's style.The purpose of the Meaning Interpretation of Gu Liang Zhuan is to construct the system of the study of Gu Liang and the history of the study.Through the study of Gu Liang's time records,especially the study of "princes funeral rites",Liu Xingen constructed "the rule of the feudal princes" as the core of the Gu Liang learning system.This is also the the core of the Meaning Interpretation of Gu Liang Zhuan as well as the key pointThis paper is divided into five chapters.Whether in the first chapter which is an analysis of "Gu Liang is good at interpretation",or the following four monographic research.We can see that "Gu Liang is good at interpretation" runs through it all.In a word,this statement has a great influence on the study of Gu Liang learning in Qing Dynasty.