Analysis And Reflection On Aesthetics Controversy In The New Period

Aesthetics theory has been greatly developed in the new period.“Post-Practical Aesthetic”has not only importing existentialism dimension into aesthetic studies but also rethinking the principle fault of Practical Aesthetics.Meanwhile,Practical Aesthetic has also developed its own specific branching such as“Neo-Practical Aesthetic”or “Practice ontology Aesthetic”,through the examine on inner and outer boundaries of the“Practice”concept,the Practical Aesthetic itself has been self-updated and improve the power of explanation.As we entered the new century,the study of Aesthetic also entered the era of blooming.With the importation of western Aesthetic study's achievement and the severe transformation in modern society,new research topic such as “Lifestyle Aesthetic”,“Recognition Aesthetic”,“Ecology Aesthetic”,“Body Aesthetic”,“Anthropology Aesthetic”,“Network Aesthetic”,“Political Aesthetic”,“Environmental Aesthetic”,“Musicality Aesthetic”,etc.has become recent increasing point in Aesthetic studies and performing its own function in different areas.While the phenomenon did proves that Aesthetic theory has been obviously entered the era of prosperity,we could not ignore the difficulties accompanied in its own developing process.Therefore,the research method we used in Aesthetic could not limited within traditional visionary but we should focus on the whole situation of Aesthetic's developing and recognition the inner pattern from the point of evolution in Aesthetic methodology.As Frederick Engles proved the conclusion of “History and Logical's uniformity”in Karl Marx's A Contribution to the Critique of Political-Economy,during the research process,one could not be disturbed by chanciness factor but should make reasonable fixation according to “the inner pattern of realistic history narration”.From this ideological instruction,the research on new era Aesthetic should not limited within the methodology of reorganizing on former study material but concentrate on the representative utterance which could stand for the specific history characteristics;we should not satisfied with the linear development perception but concentrate on the Aesthetic utterance which has contradiction with its own era and current ideology,restore its original reality through the inspection of history's detail and the rethinking of spiritual struggle between individual or self-characteristic and epoch or mainstream;we should not be superstitious in classical authoritative concept,refuse the idea which separated from its own history environment,but explore the inner law of Aesthetic during dynamic comparison and utterance formation.Hence,choosing the Aesthetic controversy as the breakthrough point of new era Aesthetic research,not only we grab the core question in Aesthetic development but also make an effective inspection on aesthetician's future theory's hopeness and reality vision.As the series of controversial problem haven't been resolved at the moment,this study could be the important utterance resource which connects past and modern times.Due to the span of time duration and the variety of discussion,the work of totally mastering in new era Aesthetic might easily lost into the dilemma of viewpoint flooding.Therefore,a breakpoint which could be valid and bring the whole picture throughout the analyzation of Aesthetic controversial is a strategy with necessity.As the essay pointing out,the contradiction between“classical inertia”and“Modern Phantasmagoria”is the breakthrough point into new era Aesthetic controversial with no alternation.From the theoretical sharpness of new era Aesthetics,it performs a transition of era which form classic to modern.However,during the specific process of Aesthetic evolution,the transformation form classical to modern is not complete without duration but shows varieties of contradiction which could not simply conclude while the structural paradox which could not ignored.Beyond all doubt,besides the political complication and the affection of western utterance,the struggle of aesthetician which tries to get rid of classical limitation could also be the critical reason.The struggling which aesthetician tries to get rid of classical theories limitation always trap into the fetters of collective unconsciousness and enter the circulation of classical theories inertia.As the utterance resources and structure process of new era Aesthetics has a strong significance of modernity,it could not avoid the complex connection with classical theories during practice: on the one hand,separate from classical theories during research is a common pursuit of aesthetician with publicity.On the other hand,the strong attraction of classical Aesthetic is compelling the researcher to recurrence to tradition;While it is the collective hope to integrate new era when we re-examine on Aesthetic,the more complex difficulties in modernity we facing than western society under the procedure of integrate into modernity could not be ignored.Hence,choosing the contradiction of“Classical Inertia”and“Modern Phantasmagoria”as the breakthrough point of this research has a strong significance in problem awareness and realistic practices.After finishing the summarize from a macro view on“Classical Inertia”and “Modern Phantasmagoria”,a deeper inspection from micro viewpoint is necessary.The essay concurs that as we make a comprehensive survey through the area of new era Aesthetic,“The controversy on theory”,“The history of study”and “The spirit of scholar”is the three fulcrum to structure the contradiction utterance of “Classical Inertia”and“Modern Phantasmagoria”.It is also an important dimension to step further into new era Aesthetic research.“The controversy on theory”mainly focus on the several significant discussion during research of new era Aesthetic.Through the selection of representative and prominent opinion,we try to capture the core problem and distinguish the main controversy in new era Aesthetic studies.Meanwhile,not limited in the re-explanation on the controversy itself or doing the narration base on the surface layer,we try to push our vision into the origin of a varieties of theories,figure out the common negatives and important achievements which has the characteristic of stability and compare the logical's pros and cons which might lead us to a judgement.We try to discussion“The history of study”from the integral transformation of new era Aesthetic and demonstrate the period fixation and paradoxical difficulties as Aesthetic theories meets modern utterance.To be specific,two points were concluded in the discussion.Firstly,exploring the function of how Aesthetic construct history from new era Aesthetic controversy and reorganizing,revealing the reason of the history factor of aesthetic controversy and its origin,base on the former studies,we might distinguish the common pursuit from different Aesthetic theory utterance,particularly in the method they performed as the theory step into practice.Secondly,from the reexamination of unique characteristic of Aesthetic theories,especially we focus on the role and function which China's new era Aesthetic expressing,we might make a inquiry to its tension and controversy thoroughly.“The spirit of scholar”mainly demonstrate the new era aesthetician's inner contradiction and dividing soul,which lead us to form the picture of Chinese Aesthetic scholar's spiritual evolution with distinction.What we should point out is that there is strong connection and a relationship of mutual inclusion between “The controversy on theory”,“The history of study”and “The spirit of scholar”.Without a clear and precise analyzation,we could not examine the history of Aesthetic objectively;Without a logical judgement on Aesthetic history,we could not finish the process to look into the spiritual world of scholars while the scholars might be the key to open the password of cultural factor in this new era Aesthetic controversy.Hence,“The controversy on theory”,“The history of study”and“The spirit of scholar”shows a character of uniformity with organization.Through the comprehensive analyzation,we might realize the true insight of new era Aesthetic,lacking the dimension is not appropriate during our studies.As conclusion,using the three factors mentioned above as a fulcrum point analyzing the controversy between“Classical inertia”and “Modern Phantasmagoria”has the possibilities both in the logical layer and realistic operating.The passage contains five chapters.In Prologue,through the judgement and induction of former studies on new era Aesthetic,we made a selection on the premier and equitable evidence which conforms with“The uniformity of history and logical”,based on the index of possibility,confirm the problem and expectation of this study.In Chapter One,through the selection of relatively controversial element in Aesthetic studies,such as“Transcendental Aesthetics”,“Life Aesthetics”and “Ontology Aesthetics”,we made a revel into the inner contradictions and structural paradox as “Post-Practical Aesthetic” and “Practical Aesthetic” performed,figured out the difficult transformation and complexity which Aesthetic scholars has suffered.In Chapter Two,we choose the controversy between “Neo-Practice Aesthetic”,“Neo-Practical Aesthetic”and“Practice Ontology Aesthetic”,we try to demonstrate the difficult transformation and diversification of“Practical Aesthetic”during the process of its self-update in new era.In Chapter Three,we choose the“the daily life routinization in Aesthetic”,“Body Aesthetic”,“Recognition Aesthetic”and“bie-modernism”as the new utterance controversy in new era Aesthetic studies,the work of conclude the common factor through varieties of differential Aesthetic theories has been done.Epilogue discusses the classical aesthetics research in the new period end of inertia and the specific operational path of modern vision,through the analysis of scientific aesthetics research academic basis,explain aesthetic scientific research to deepen Chinese aesthetic self-realization,complete academic form from the classical to the modern transformation of the important role and practical significance.