Font Size: a A A

The epistemic basing relation

Posted on:1997-07-26Degree:Ph.DType:Dissertation
University:The Ohio State UniversityCandidate:Korcz, Keith AllenFull Text:PDF
GTID:1465390014482899Subject:Philosophy
Abstract/Summary:
The epistemic basing relation is the relation occurring between a belief and a reason when the reason is the reason for which the belief is held. It marks the distinction between a belief's being justifiable for a person, and the person's being justified in holding the belief. As such, it is an essential component of any complete theory of epistemic justification.; I survey and evaluate all theories of the basing relation that I am aware of published between 1965 and 1995. These include causal theories, (such as those discussed by Paul Moser, D. M. Armstrong, etc.), theories involving pseudo-overdetermination (counterfactual) relations (as discussed by Marshall Swain, Jonathan Kvanvig, George Pappas, etc.), theories involving what a person would appeal to in defense of her beliefs (Keith Lehrer), and doxastic theories (Robert Audi, Joseph Tolliver, Richard Fumerton, etc.), involving an appeal to meta-beliefs. My discussion of these theories includes a detailed analysis of variations of Lehrer's case of the gypsy lawyer which, I show, can be reformulated to pose a decisive objection to causal theories, if not causal analyses, of the basing relation.; Rejecting all published theories, I present a new kind of causal analysis of the basing relation which I call the causal-doxastic theory. This theory states that a belief is based on a reason if the reason bears an appropriate causal relation to the belief, or, it does not bear such a causal relation, but an appropriate meta-belief is present. A causal analysis of which meta-beliefs are appropriate is given, so as to count as inappropriate rationalizations, mistaken meta-beliefs, etc. In developing the causal-doxastic theory, I present a solution to the problem of deviant causal chains, a discussion of the causal sustaining of beliefs, an account of rejecting reasons, and a partial analysis of showing that one is justified. I then discuss implications of my theory regarding foundationalism, inference, basic and non-basic belief, holistic and linear coherentism, process reliabilism, (accessibility) internalism and externalism, and various closure (transmission) principles.
Keywords/Search Tags:Basing relation, Belief, Epistemic, Reason, Causal, Theories
Related items