An Interpretation Study Of The Analects Of Confucius In Ming Dynasty

Looking at the Chinese academic history, Confucian Analects has become a profound and multi-dimensional world under the ancient Confucian's splendid interpretation of discourse. Ancient scholars thought that the essence of the study of Confucian classics was all in Confucian Analects, and Confucian Analects is the combination of The Six Lections.The Confucian Analects can be understood as the entry. The interpretation of works on Confucian Analects has become the necessary task in the history of Chinese academic research.This paper belongs to the Confucian Analects'study the release history by period, broadly defined in1368-1644, the Ming Dynasty about276years' time.lt focuses on the research of the Confucian Analects'table and the interpretation of the Confucian Analects'works in the Ming Dynasty. Therefore, this paper mainly use the following three methods:firstly, micro investigation, which is used not only to read the the Confucian Analects'works compiled in this material, but also to discuss the analysis and interpretation according to different interpretations of the Confucian Analects'content-implications of view. Secondly, compared with the social, political and cultural background, the temporal and spatial relationship between vertical and horizontal comparison not only needs to tap the same point in comparison, more to find its particularity. Thirdly, systematic construction, which constructs a new interpretation of the rich world of meaning systematically about the Confucian Analects'works in the Ming Dynasty. The Discussion of Explanatory Notes on the Confucian Analects in the Ming Dynasty is the main part of this paper.It is divided into three plates of the argument, such as the Confucian Analects'interpretation from the perspective of Cheng Zhu Neo Confucianism, the Confucian Analects'interpretation from the perspective of Lu Wang Xinxue and the Confucian Analects'interpretation from the perspective of integration. Through flexible use of the above three methods, the author is ready to tease out the venation of Explanatoiy Notes on the Confucian Analects in the Ming Dynasty, reveal the law, summarizes its characteristics, pay attention to the analysis and interpretation of the feelings, in order to grasp its internal and external unity carrying diversity and harmony coming from The Discussion of Explanatory Notes on the Confucian Analects in the Ming Dynasty.The first chapter selects Hu Guang, Cai Qing, Lv Ran, Gao Gong, Zhang Juzheng as the Confucian Analects'interpretation of the case, from the angle of Cheng Zhu Neo Confucianism's status change. Both Hu Guang's Integration of Confucianism&Fill in the Gaps, or Cai Qing's Analyze Minutely&Hook Deeply, or Lv Ran's The Public&One Learned, can be seen to provide some reference for an ideal society by neo-Confucianism scholar's theory. It makes the theory greatly close Zhu Xue's cultural significance. Especially in the critical period of social structure formed in the late Ming Dynasty change and social transformation in the practical thought background, Gao Gong's Ask Recognition&Access to Realistic and Zhang Juzheng's Emperor of Preaching&Understand the Pragmatic reflect the thoughts, and serve the theory program, which provides direct services to their reform activities.The second chapter selects Wang Yangming, Wang Gen, Luo Rufang Zhou Rudeng, Jiao Hong, LiZhi, Lin Zhao en, Yuan Zongdao, Zhang Dai as the Confucian Analects'interpretation of the case, from the perspective of the development of the land of Wang Xinxue. First of all, Wang Yangming's Chuanxi Record often has the existing characteristics as Functioning for a Mind&Chuanxi Conscience, which is coherent in the interpretation of the Confucian Analects.It has consistent interpretation revealing contemporary humanistic care. Secondly, as the founder of Taizhou school, Wang Gen not only restores the restoration of the original Confucian vivid life wisdom, but also carries a spirit of the times in the theoretical construction of its own in the Recorded Utterance, reflecting the social demands of bud of capitalism and the behalf of the existence of a new society.His annotation features also set up the academic model necessary for the Taizhou school behind. As the outstanding representative of Taizhou School, Luo Rufang and Zhou Rudeng continue along the academic path blazed by Wang Yangming and Wang Gen.Whether Luo Rufang's Ask the Kernel to Oneself&Have the Return to Propriety or Zhou Rudeng's Heart shall Prevail&Returning to Themselves, all that two people is from the perspective of Confucian benevolence horizon of interpretation. As the representative of the Taizhou school, Jiao Hong and Li Zhi is in sharp contrast, a psychology analysis most significantly, a literary play the most conscious. Finally, Lin Zhaoen, Yuan Zongdao and Zhang Dai are typical representatives of the Confucian Analects of the New Mind in the new situation.Their writing attitudes and characteristics are tend to integration and convergence. The above scholars focus on the solution of the subjective spirit experience and their interpretation process has their distinct spiritual purport.The third chapter selects Gu Xiancheng, Liu Zongzhou, Chen Shiyuan, Hao Jing, Gu Menglin, Matteo Ricci, Zhi Xu as the Confucian Analects'interpretation of the case. As the Donglin school pioneer and leader, Gu Xiancheng's Beyond the Wang School&Revive the Zhu School trying to understand thoroughly Wang Yangming and Zhu Xi, and the like Liu Zongzhou. Whether Chen Shiyuan or Hao Jing or Gu Menglin, these three people is a compromise. The Zhixu and Matteo Ricci is out of the church missionary to the Confucian Analects text interpretation. The above scholars all reflect the unique and variegated academic landscape in this period.There are similarities and personalities between the above three plates of the argument. The interpretive paradigm has the same ultimate goal of learning for practice. The difference is only due to the existence of the emphasis point and threshold range. In particular, they have one thing in common, that is the scholars have the sense of feeling strong perception to the classic texts. In their view, the important thing is how to interpret the present life, and not to the classic texts. Their interpretation of Confucian Analects' works, also proved that their spirits are really effectively expressed by the classical perspective and interpretation. The explanatory notes on the Confucian Analects in the Ming Dynasty reflect an overall feature by Cheng Zhu to Lu Wang and by the classics to literature. The most prominent representative is Feng Menglong who has a sharp aesthetic vision. Finally, the author put forward three enlightenment, such as returning to the present&returning to life, returning to the original books&returning to ourselves, and having the courage to construct&remolding confucianism.