| The general catalogue of Siku Quanshu(hereinafter referred to as Zong mu)describes 95 kinds of abstracts from 76 writers and 26 kinds from 11 writers.In terms of absolute quantity,it is not much more than the collection of Zong mu in song,yuan,Ming and Qing Dynasties.However,if combined with the situation of Tang Dynasty’s anthology,Zong mu can be regarded as the most concentrated and authoritative description and criticism of Tang Bie Ji.The Tang Dynasty is the first complete literary history era recorded in the anthology of Zong mu.Under the condition that there were few remains of Han and Tang Dynasties,the officials actively searched for the old books and collected more.Through the summary,they showed the whole Tang Dynasty literature as much as possible,and constructed the first generation of the collection of Zong mu.On the division and division of Tang Dynasty literature.The problem of the division of literary history is often concerned at the beginning or the end of generations.Because there are not many writers and works in the Sui and Tang Dynasties,and there are few people who have an important position in the history of literature,in addition to the serious loss of anthologies in this period,the problem of dividing the literary history from Sui Dynasty to Tang Dynasty is not very prominent in the general catalogue,and the problem is mainly concentrated in the end.In the end of the Tang Dynasty and the Five Dynasties,the scholars in the general catalogue had the situation of "lack" in the Five Dynasties and "expansion" in the end of the Tang Dynasty.From the end of Tang Dynasty to the Five Dynasties,Du Guangting was the only one of the 13 people in Zong mu,which was totally different from the time limit of the Five Dynasties Poetry and the whole Five Dynasties Poetry.Compared with the Tang Dynasty,the literature of the Five Dynasties was obviously ignored in the general catalogue.At the same time,the scope of the literature of the Tang Dynasty was further expanded.This is closely related to the librarian’s view of literary history and even orthodoxy.The debate on the historical status of the Five Dynasties has affected the historical limit of the literature and even the literature of the Five Dynasties.Especially,the general catalogue,which is based on the official position,is more restricted by the orthodox concept.Under the influence of this concept,the late Tang Dynasty was endowed with a kind of loyal literary spirit.The issue of the periodization of the literature of the Tang Dynasty is a continuation of the concept of "four Tang Dynasties",but at the same time,it is also known as "the case of limitation,also on the general ear".The most direct expression is the arrangement of Tang Bie Ji.The basic clue of the sorting of the general catalogue is the order of the times.However,apart from the main line,the anthologies of the Tang Dynasty are not arranged in strict accordance with the chronological order.There are a lot of cross ordering situations.The emergence of these situations is the arrangement and thinking of the internal logic of the evolution of literature in the Tang Dynasty.On the edition information and literature citation of the abstracts of Tang Bie Ji.There are actually two major literature systems behind the general catalogue.One is the various editions of books searched and collected by the whole country when compiling the "Four Treasuries";the other is the citation literature system used by the Librarians in the abstract writing for textual research,comparison and explanation.The two major literature systems are respectively related to the specific contents of version information and literature citation,which constitute the connotation and extension of the writing of the general catalogue,and are the most direct source of materials for the production of the abstract.It is in the process of tracing the source of the two major literature systems that the librarian formed a series of thoughts and ideas in the general catalogue.The textual research on the edition and literature citation of the general catalogue also includes the analysis of the narrative logic of the abstract writing.The two major literature systems behind the general catalogue have actually entered the stage of "secondary narration" of the original literature after the librarian’s hand.This process has implied the leading role of the librarian on the literature.Compared with the original version information of the "Basic Edition",there are some variations in the version information,such as the content increase and loss,the separation and combination of articles and volumes,and the difference of characters.In terms of literature citation,there are some original documents A choice,misinterpretation,or misunderstanding.It is helpful to dig out the political core of the librarian’s scholarship by re examining the information of the abstract version and literature citation.In addition to the basic composition of the abstract writing,version information and literature citation also create an academic and rigorous narrative posture for the general catalogue.The "secondary narration" of the abstract appeals to the discussion of academic and textual research,effectively covering the political intention behind it.On the surface,a large number of materials and documents are used in the abstract writing of the anthology of the general catalogue.The librarian also uses the way of academic exploration to study the origin and development of the collection and comments on the literati in a seemingly objective manner.However,if the original documents related to the abstract writing are re sorted,contrasted and differentiated according to the librarian’s quotation,then the political nature under the Academy will be clearly revealed.To a great extent,the criticism of the Tang Dynasty literature in the general catalogue was launched against the background of the dispute between the Tang and Song dynasties.Under the background of the dispute between Tang and Song Dynasties,the literary criticism of Zong mu presents the position of following the Tang Dynasty.The librarian,in contrast with the poems and essays of the Tang Dynasty,shows the differences of the Tang Dynasty.In terms of poetry,the general catalogue places the Tang poetry in an irreplaceable position,and holds that all the styles of Tang poetry are well prepared and quite popular.In terms of literature,the Tang literary criticism of Zong mu takes into account both parallel prose and prose,and pays attention to the content of the article The quality of "Fenggu" implied in the comparison between "Ci" and "Zhi" is to advocate elegant and original articles of Tao.In terms of the tendency of poetry and literary criticism in the Tang Dynasty in the general catalogue,the librarians,in their comparative criticism of the literature in the Tang Dynasty,Song Dynasty and even later,regarded the literati and literature of the Tang Dynasty as the object and source of learning from the later generations,thus presenting a literary criticism standpoint of taking the Tang Dynasty as the "orthodox".The construction of the Tang Dynasty literary criticism system of the general catalogue is based on the literary evaluation of the Tang Dynasty’s poetry and prose works.However,the librarian’s criticism of the Tang Dynasty literature is not only on the literary level,but also includes the political and ethical dimensions of the times and the theory of moral character.If we combine the background of the dispute between the Tang and Song dynasties in Qing Dynasty,we can find that the literary criticism of Tang Dynasty in Zong mu is a systematic construction of multiple characteristics,such as moral ethics,literati mentality and political appeal,which started from literature.As for the literary criticism of the Tang Dynasty,the general catalogue constructs the evaluation system of the collected works of the Tang Dynasty with the abstract of the collected works of the Tang Dynasty as the center.The theories of "canon,reality","elegance" and "canon" in the critical discourse of the museum officials’ summary constitute the evaluation principles and value orientation of the model academic,aesthetic and regular of the general catalogue.The summary of Tang’s Anthologies in the general catalogue,concerning the time,style and other models,finally converged into the "Tang style" paradigm in literary criticism.The establishment of the "model" of style under the official aesthetic must be in line with the consciousness of the librarian and the imperial power.As the style model of the summary of the Tang Bie Ji in the general catalogue,it basically presents the characteristics of the times of the early Tang Dynasty,which is characterized by the style of the early Tang Dynasty,the style of the prosperous Tang Dynasty is diverse and vigorous,the Early Tang Dynasty is beautiful and the Mid Tang Dynasty is beautiful and clear,and the Late Tang Dynasty reposes the profound and unique leisure.The greatest significance of the general catalogue to the literary criticism of the Tang Dynasty lies in the construction of a literary evaluation system with "Tang" as the paradigm.The literary evaluation of the abstract shows that the librarian evaluates the gains and losses of other writers’ literary works based on the style and style of the Tang Dynasty.The librarian intends to guide the formation of a literature with the literary style of the Tang Dynasty.Finally,as the "model" in the "model",the research librarian’s criticism of Li Bai and Du Fu(comparative criticism,intertextual criticism and influence criticism)provides a more specific and micro perspective for further understanding the strategy of literary criticism in the general catalogue,exploring the binding force of "model" criticism on official thought,the influence of literary model and even the construction force of literary history shaping.The general catalogue is first of all a bibliography work,but the literary historical materials and literary concepts involved in the writing of the abstract,as well as the style formed by the librarian in the process of compiling the abstract,make it have very prominent characteristics of literary history in the stage of "pre literary history".Not only that,the materials and viewpoints about the literature of Tang Dynasty in the general catalogue,after the establishment of the discipline of literary history,also provided the basis and reference for the compilation of many literary history.After dialectics and analysis,it will be beneficial to complement and deepen the traditional literary history to regard the general catalogue as a literary history in a broad sense. |
