Discussion Of To Establish The Regulations Of Co-management Of Protection Areas In China

In recent years, Protection Areas (PA) was increasing largely in quantity and area. But the protection and conservation of biodiversity or nature resources and relative culture resources have not increased in such rate. Many PAs were just"paper PAs"for they were not managed in effective way. There are so many reasons for the situation. Among of them the traditional management which has the low cost of design and high cost of execution and supervision is one of the most important reasons. Compared with it, the co-management has the high cost of design and low cost of execution and supervision which is the new economic management style. So I analyze the establishment of the regulations of co-management of PA.The dissertation has four parts and generally 35,000 words.The first part of the dissertation is the expatiation of the concept and characters of co-management of Protection Areas (PA) .The co-management of PA is a technology of management that the government and aborigines and other stakeholders are sharing the power of control and responding the liability of management for the same aim of NR management or biodiversity and relative culture protection. It is not only formally negotiation, but also means the virtual power of decision, planning, execution, valuation and so on. Its characters are the diversification of the body of co-management, decentralization of authority, the highly consensus and so on.The second part is the discussion of reason to establish the Co-management of PA. The traditional management could not to adapt the development of PA. Proved by the experiences in the ecological research and the right of free choice, Co-management of PA becomes the best choice to change the disadvantages.The third part is the general thought of to establish the regulations of Co-management of PA in china. The practices have shown many problems, which is the old-fashion legation ideology of conservation biodiversity; aborigines who the lack of capability to participate, and the low level legal of management of PA; the unclearly right of participation. Then I suggest establish the Co-management of PA. The first step is to change the traditional legation ideology of protection, and then we should realize the essence of Co-management of PA is the construction of the capability of aborigines or local communities. On such basis we would establish a new model of public management. The forth part is to conceive the establishment of Co-management of PA, mainly from the subject, the procedure of the negotiation before Co-management, the organization of Co-management and the agreement of Co-management.