Effect On Stomachic Chinese Herb On Production Capability And Immunity Function Of Fatten Pigs

In order to produce one additive instead of antibiotics and to depress antibiotics leave behind as well as pollution of antibiotics, the trial investigated the effect on growing capability; nutrition absorptivity; blood index; immunity function; germ in feces; butchering index; pork quality and benefit by using stomachic Chinese herb feed additives. We chose 90 healthy pigs, which had similar weights (P>0.05) and 45-day lives. A group was using 0.05% stomachic Chinese herb. B group was using 0. 1% stomachic Chinese herb. C group was using antibiotics in feedstuff. Every group had also divided into 3 groups with 10 pigs each. The contrast experiment indicated:(1) Average end weight of A and B groups had separately increased 12% and 21% compared to C group, B group had increased 8% compared to A group (P<0.01). Appetite on daily feedstuff of A and B groups had separately increased 16% and 24% compared to C group, B group had increased 7% compared to A group (P<0.01).(2) Loin-eye area of A and B groups had separately increased 13% and 19% compared to C group, B group had increased 5% compared to A group (P<0.01). Butchering rate of A and B groups had separately increased 3% and 4% compared to C group (P<0.05).(3) Digest ratio of protein of A and B groups had separately increased 5% and 6% compared to C group (P<0.05). Digest ratio of fattiness of A and B groups had separately increased 5% and 7% compared to C group (P<0.05).(4) The content of T-BILI of A and B groups had separately depressed 31% and 46% compared to C group, B group had depressed 22% compared to A group (P<0.01). The content of TG of A and B groups had separately depressed 50% and 58% compared to C group, B group had depressed 38% compared to A group (P<0.01). The content of Ch of A and B groups had separately depressed 40% and 46% compared to C group, B group had depressed 10% compared to A group (P<0.01).(5) Marble line of A and B groups had separately increased 12% and 22% compared to C group, B group had increased 8% compared to A group (P<0.01). Ch content in muscle of A and B groups had separately depressed 12% and 23% compared to C group, B group had depressed 10% compared to A group (P<0.01). The essential amino acid content of B group had separately increased 4% and 5% compared to A and C groups (P<0.05). C18:2 content of A and B groups had separately increased 3% and 12% compared to C group, B group had increased 9% compared to A group (P<0.01). ALA content of A and B groups had separately increased 37% and 83% compared to C group, B group had increased 33% compared to A group (P<0. 01).(6) C3bR and IC rate of B group had separately increased 11% and 13% compared to C group (P<0.05). EaT and EACB index of A and B groups had separately increased 19%, 20%; 14%, 18% compared to C group (P<0. 01).(7) Coliform index of B group had separately depressed 7% and 9% compared to A and C groups (P<0.05). Sporangium bacterium index of B group had separately increased 4% and 5% compared to A and C groups (P<0.05). Lactobacillus index of A and B groups had separately increased 14% and 57% compared to C group, B group had. increased 38% compared to A group (P<0.01).(8) Benefit index of A and B groups had separately increased 17%(ï¿¥52) and 30%(ï¿¥96) compared to C group, B group had increased 12% (ï¿¥42) compared to A group (P<0.01).(9) Stomachic Chinese herb could instead of antibiotics use for feed additive and it is worth to apply on breeding pigs.