| In this experiment fish behavior and feeding the ball to bite method combines twoapproaches, through repetition, contrast test, Su-Anabaena, ranked grass, anise, perillae, plantpeptide, costustroot, compound amino acids, animal peptide, male clove, nine kinds of singleattractant substances of gold carp(Carassius auratus )attractant effect of nine kinds of monomers indetermining the concentration of attractant substances on the basis of nine kinds of single attractantsubstances for parallel experiment, to determine their optimal concentrations, and feeding rate to 15d test, by measuring the weight gain rate of crucian carp, feed coefficient, such as feeding ratetarget date to determine the monomer attractant agents and growth promoting effects. Put theoptimum concentration of attractant substances into C9# to 84 kinds of composite materials, eachcompound attractant by the optimum combination by volume of 1: 1: 1 ball bite, and furtherselected attractant compound effective material combinations, and then the filter effect of theattractant compound material combination 3×3 orthogonal test, each test selected orthogonal group1 gold carp attractant effect of the composite material significantly composite attractantcombination of agents, through the feeding experiment to determine the composite rate of attractantagent and the effect of promoting growth. Through a variety of monomers between the attractantsubstances, composite attractant complex between the agent and each agent with the attractantcomposition of the monomer derived attractant substances compared the effect of the gold carpattractant of the most prominent material.The experimental results are as follows:(1) Nine kinds of single gold carp attractant substances on the effect of the attractantBehavior through the bite offish ball, screening out of nine kinds of single gold carp attractantmaterial effect on the optimal concentration of obvious are: Su-Anabaena0.25 percent, 0.05 percentranked grass, anise 0.05 percent, perillae0.75 percent, 0.25 percent of plant peptide, costustroot0.05 percent, 0.35 percent compound amino acids, peptide animal 0.10 percent, 0.15 percent ofmale clove. Add a gold carp intake at different monomer feed attractant substances, apart frommale clove 0.15 percent and 0.10percent of public animal peptide, the growth rate in the controlgroup than those on different levels with the improvement of 0.35percent compound amino acid,0.05percent Costustroot, 0.25percent of plant peptide, 0.05percent anise, 0.05percent ranked grass, perillae 0.75percent, 0.25percent Anabaena Su-General of the target group was superior to the control group, at 0.35percent diet compound amino acid group than the control group a high rate of weight gain of 282.50 percent, and 0.05percent compared with control group costustroot 228.90 percent high.(2) Composite carp attractant on the attractant effect of goldSelected by orthogonal test of the golden carp attractant effective dose of compound 11, are separately 1#-3,2#-8,3#-8,4#-5,5#-7,6#-5,7#-2,8#-7,9#-6,10#-9 and ll#-2. Put each group attractant agent compound added to the basic feed, respectively, fed to come, one of 5#-7,7#-2,1#-3,8#-7 and 4#-5 gold crucian carp attractant best , 3#-8,9#-6 and 2#-8 gold carp attractant effect on the second, and 11#-2,10#-9 and 6#-5attractant effect of the worst. Experimental results of feeding rate5#-7,7#-2,1#-3,8#-7 and 4#-5 higher than the rate of weight gain, feed less than the control group, the difference between the groups significantly (p＜0.05), the target with the control group were significantly different(p＜0.05), showed better results attractant 11#-2,10#-9 and 6#-5of the bad target than the control group.(3) Composite attractant agent with the monomer composition of carp attractant attractant material effect on the gold comparisonAttractant agent by comparing the composite and the composite material of the monomer compared attractant, attractant through the golden carp to bite the ball the number of agents to determine the effect of more significant attractant agent is one of the 1#-3,2#-8,8#-7 attractant these agents are complex compound containing amino acids, and amino acid monomers were no significant differences between, which can be drawn, complex amino acids are better attractant agent; 3#-8 and Plant peptide monomers were no significant differences between; 10#-9 and animal peptide monomers were no significant differences between the. |
PDF Full Text Request