Reflective Marxism Of Ойэерман And Its Morden Value

The Marxism philosophy ofОйзерман,comes into this world during the hardest time after the disintegration of USSR and the unprecedented transformation of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. As a former academician of Soviet Academy of Sciences and a representative of the"Reflective school of Marxism", he has formed quiet new ideas in recent years just after his historical examination and reassessment of the relationships between Marxism and Utopianism, Dogmatism and Revisionism.As it comes to the relationship between Marxism and dogmatism, he thinks that dogmatism is a nature character of Marxism itself. But the history itself takes advantage of this character of Marxism and causes so much problems, which ruins the energy of Marxism. When it comes to the relationship between Marxism and utopianism, he thinks that even Marx and Engels tried so hard to overcome the limited of the utopianism, this effort had no paid back. When it comes to the relationship between the Marxism and revisionism, he has this opinion, which is going to defence the revisionism.Ойзерманinsists that only the frequent adjustment and amendment of a theory can keep it alive and provide the power to develop. Then, the reflectiom comes to the development and spread in Soviet Union, and comes to this conclusion, which implied that the Soviet learders made some misunderstanding about the basic concepts of Marxism, as well as the frequently using of them under the purpose of utilities, and finally turn Marxism into dogmatism. At the end of his theory,Ойзерманmakes a critical examination of dialectical and historical materialism. He insists that when we treat Marxism as a theory of dialectical and historical materialism, the only reasonable explanation is to take it as an immature theory with many concepts without logical argumentation and a lot of questions without any solution.The reflection of the Marxism in his theory put forward many unorthodox but enlightening views. And it means a lot when we begin to deal with our hot issues nowdays, especially when it comes to the localization of Marxism in China. However, on the other hand, we cannot deny that his theory also has many fundamental defects. The most important one is the ignore of the study of living person in Marxism, which makes Marxism has a fundamental different from the other theories. Treats Marxism equaly as a theory of dialectical and historical materialism, is kind of simple. The second defect in his theory is that he blames the failure of the Soviet Union only to the dogmatism. His opinion is worth for further analysis. The last and not the smallest defect relate to the issues of revisionism. His theory cannot put forward a valuable and convinced standards to distinguish whether the revise are positive to the development of a theory.