Comparing Korea War And Vietnam War Of Research

The main ideas of the thesis are: In struggling of the world politics, every nation has different choices and action in different periods from its own angle, in order to get the great national profits. And different choices probably producer clash. When clash can't harmonize, war, as the important way to continue the political clash, will be need inevitably. The international background of Korea War and Vietnam War is similar, and geographic place is close, and the main belligerent states are repeated, but the break-out of the war the developing of the war and the effect and the result of the war are hierologic. It proves that from occurring of the war to finishing, every step of the war has the causal relationship with political clash. However, be cause outside the conditions are indeterminate, every selection of political clash and war course must be flexible and variable, and the state must make the new selection based on the changed condition, otherwise, it will damage the national profits of their own. And the choice of avoiding the war should be the first of all.The paper is made up of preface, body and summary. And, there are three parts in the body.The first part compares the origins of the two wars. This section analyses the different causes of the two war's breakout, emphasize the different targets and the transformation of the policy of America when it attended the two wars. This section analyses the different choices and actions that America made to maintain its national benefits in different periods and conditions.The second part compares the course of wars. By comparing every specific aspect of the wars, including the scale of wars the strategy and tactics Soviet and wars and the end of the wars, the paper emerges the feature of the two wars in microcosm.The third part compares the result and effect of each war. The paper compares the outcome of the wars of Korea, Vietnam America China and Soviet, synthetically analyses the reasons of victory or failure, summarizes the mutual relations of the different choices and the final result. The paper combines the main belligerent states' change after wars emerges the deep influences to every nation after wars, and to international relation ship. The paper still emphasizes the unfavorable influences that America's overseas policy and military interference made to itself. Finally, from thechangeable curve of the war and peace and region security in twentieth century, the paper stresses the importance of sticking up for peace and avoiding the war in civilization's progress, in present age when peace and development have been the subjects of the time.The new trails of the paper are that it compares the two wars by the theories of international relationship such as historical materialism, emphasizes the interaction between the international relationship, sums up the regularity of the change international situation under different conditions, then brings forward the experiences and lessons the responding actions of various nations in different periods.