The Predicament And Outlet Of The Coincidence View Of Truth Under The Viewing Area Of Epistemology

The traditional view of truth does the understanding of epistemology only inaccording with view of coincidence, and confines it to the viewing area of epistemology.This view of coincidence truth must encounter what the modern epistemology is facing:since subjective and objective are different qualities, how possible is the understanding oftruth? Mainly from the interrogation of logic and experience. This view of truth isarbitrary and mechanic, falling into the theoretic predicament, and causing realisticpredicament as well if used for instructing practice. It is obviously impossible to solve theproblem of epistemological truth under the pure epistemology viewing area. Thereforeonly by surmounting simple epistemology can it be settled. Marx is the first one to gobeyond the rational doctrine of Germany's classical philosophy and turn to the theory ofpractice so as to open up a brand-new thinking to solve the difficulty of the traditionalview of epistemological truth.The proposition of Marxist view of practical truth has great theoretical and realisticvalue. In theory, it brings truth into practice, holding that the antithesis of subjectivity andobjectivity only take place at the level of self-reflection and that this kind of antithesis isonly a derivative state in which the subjectivity and objectivity mix. When practicebecomes the original prerequisite of cognition, subjectivity and objectivity can be unifiedin practice. In reality, it is the prerequisite of insisting on and developing Marxism. Itbecomes theoretical foundation of the view of scientific development, having greatrealistic meanings in constructing the harmonious well-off society.