Research Regarding Homogeous Structure In Modern Uygur Languague

From Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure, language study entered into a new stage from the frame of traditional linguistics theory. During this period, many linguists paid attention to the study of homogeneous structure and made some research and progress. For instance, research of linguists Bloomfield and Chomsky in grammatical structure, homogeneous structure is described and analysed the focus of describing and problem solving. It also seeks the reason and interval factors of homogeneous structure homonym. As a common practice in language, a great many of homogeneous structure can be found in modern Uygur language(excluding words sharing similar sound). Homogeneous structure refers to a word identical in written form and in sound with another given word of the same language, but entirely different in meaning and sometime in origin. The grammar system and the interpretation of Uygur can be probed into this characteristic of modern Uygur.Homogeneous structure in modern Uygur language is caused by dimensional language factors.A great number of materials and items related to homogeneous structure in Uygur glossary and Uygur dictionary are the homonym and polysemy, which is a prominent feature in Uygur with exactly the same written form and sound. In the research of modern Uygur, many scholars focus on homonym and polysemy, or study the ambiguity from language syntactic perspective. But it is found that homogeneous structure in pragmatic dimension and semantic are more complex and worthy to be studied.This paper first give a brief introduction to homogeneous structure, its conditions, the structural features and function from different language dimensions. Based on meaning, homogeneous structure is divided into two categories. One is ambiguity meaning in the same form, the other is puns in the same form. These two categories are further sorted and analysed according to their features and function. The paper then points out the common patterns of ambiguous meaning and its solving methods. The pattern of ambiguous meaning ought to be avoided as much as possible due to equivalent barriers in communication. The methods to deal with this problem are: vocabulary substitution, supplement, sentence pattern or structure changing, adding, different intonation, etc. On the counterary, puns in the same form is the language pattern to be utilized actively. The rhetorical devices in Uygur, such as puns, metaphor, irony, euphemism, etc. all share this feature. The advantage of puns in the same form is expressed in pragmatic function, like humor, irony, connotation, self-protection and so on. Accordingly, it is necessary to help students realize its positive aspect. It enables students to improve their reading skill, literature critical ability, and cooperative ability. Therefore, their language can be colorful and vivid, rich in communicative effectiveness by applying its pragmatic function.The paper attempts to prove that language is dimensional with different factors harmonized and conflicted with one another. The study also sheds light on teaching in modern Uygur and help students get to know the relation of language unit from different dimensions, thus forming their own language view, gaining learning methods, and studying dynamically. The significance of homogeneous structure study lies in dialectic learning. Students should not only study the pattern but also sorts of variation, meaning, and application, saving the trouble of mechanical word reciting and grammar learning.