On The Cooperation Movement And Social Development Of Countryside During The Period Of Nanjing Republican Government Regline

The rural cooperative movement was the Nanjing Nationalgovernment's beneficial attempt to promote our nation's agriculturalmodernization; certain interactive relationship exists between the ruralcooperation movement and the transition of modern rural society incontemporary countryside.After the western cooperation thoughts was localized in China, themovement led by national government aimed at rescue the countryside,by means of cooperation movement, was launched rapidly. Thegovernment firstly made use of its administrative authority resourcesto operate cooperation propagation and cooperation legislation andbuild a set of full cooperation administrative system and cooperationmovement all over the countryside coercively. The quantitydevelopment and distribution of rural cooperation organizationsreflected that government played a dominant role in society.With the extensive establishment of cooperative organization, thecooperation movement was developing in extensive rural area. On onehand, it becomes the political tool for government to control ruralsociety to realize the democracy; on the other hand, it also profoundlyinfluenced the traditional rural society. The cooperative organizationssmashed the traditional leasehold situation of rural society dominatedby usurers and promoted the rural society transfer traditional debit andcredit relationship to modern type. At the same time, route duties ofcooperation organizations also promote the improvement oftraditional agriculture production. It infused the modern gene intotraditional rural agriculture production. Fully understanding and summarizing the movement, assimilatingits experiences & lessons will be significant for the construction ofmodern countryside. The thesis will analyzes and reflects from thefollowing aspects:In the 1st part, analyzes the backgrounds of society & economy,thoughts & theories, politics that the government advocates andpromotes the movement.In the 2nd part, recounts and studies the general situation,characteristics and contents of the movement.In the 3rd part, discusses the actual effects and the rural socialtransition.In the epilogue part, comments the effect of the movement as awhole, though it was minimum to renew & advance rural economy,the movement was a beneficial attempt to modernize the countryside.Foresee the future by reviewing the past, as the cooperativeorganization is a self-helping and mutual-helping organization, if thegovernment can provide protection and guidance properly, it shouldbe apt to change the countryside and promote the development ofsociety.