Dialectics, Humanism And Dialectic-Humanism

Raya Dunayevskaya thought only to review the historical value of Hegelian dialectics could we find out the"Marx's original foundation", which was a kind of"Neo-Humanism"permeating from young Marx's thinking to mature Marx's thinking. She deepened the value of Hegel's"Negative Dialectics", unscrambled Marx's work"Economic & Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844"with a view of Humanism. In the meantime she combined the dialectics and Humanism so to call Marxist-Humanism as Dialectic-Humanism. Furthermore, Raya Dunayevskaya considered Marx's"Capital"pervaded Hegelian dialectic, and she debated with"structuralism-Marxist"so as to"reconstruct"Marxist in virtue of"Neo-Humanism"which was the basic contents of the historical dialectics in her opinion. That was to try to explain at the very beginning Marx's philosophy was the political theory and economic theory, or to say it was the historical dialectics which combined theory and practice, philosophy and political economics. It's a scientific ideology of proletariate which was distinguished from bourgeois ideology, for she thought it would become the philosophy of Dialectic-Humanism to realize the"freedom"of the human beings.The passage contains four parts, part 1 to part 3 is a main statement of her thinking. There's a judgement in Part 4 via comparing her opinion with Louis Althusser's, so as to open out the contribution and importance of Mark's Neo-Materialism Philosophy which based on"practice".