Dual Dimension Of The Ideology Critical Theory In The Context Of The Commodity Fetishism

Marx’s critique of fetishism theory as the beginning and end of the political economics research and development and the formation of historical materialism presents an internal logic process. From the early alienation criticism in humanistic and then the further investigation of the alienation problem within the framework of historical materialism theory to the completion of critique of political economy, Marx discusses the problems of fetishism horizon more broad meaning and theoretical domain also becomes heavy. In the process of this logic, Marx’s critique of fetishism theory highlights same theory care and spiritual essence with the critique of political economy and historical materialism,that is the organic unity of science analysis of history object and value identified of history subject,meanwhile, Marx’s critique of fetishism theory is the theoretical results of the reveal of capitalist society contradiction movement law of production relations and the nature of the employment and then to clarify reverse relationship between people and things in economic of object rule. Marx’s critique of fetishism theory has become an important dimension of bourgeois ideology criticism,constitute a deep ductility of Marx’s critique of ideology.Explore the ideology critical theory in the Context of the Marx’s commodity fetishism, not only constitute a necessary logic to understood Marx’s theory of commodity fetishism critical and the sight of ideology critique to convert, but also become an necessary dimension of Marxism after Marx’s interpretation of Marx’s critical theory of ideology and in their historical period to restate ideology theory. Lukacs and Althusser as "skilled" in the history of ideology, more as their different social and historical context of nascent discourse in capitalist ideology critique, also are starting from Marx’s commodity fetishism to elucidate their respective theoretical dimension of ideology critique.Lukacs through the real dimension to absorb and study of commodity fetishism, comprehensive derivation his " reification " theory. Reification as a realistic factor, there is no gap to inject in a capitalist society in every corner. Lukacs had revealing and critical of reification is link with his interpretation of reification overcome path. He tried to restore the orthodox marxism as a "methods",and totalized as the methodology basis to overcome reification.He favored the subject making him stressed that the same subject and object of the proletariat is the main force to break the reification reality, and give consciousness of the proletariat pre-existence in the process. To sum up, as Lukacs elucidation of the reification theory by examining the commodity production organization form in capitalist society, in an attempt to break the traditional interpretation of objectivism paradigm of Marxist philosophy, restore the subjectivity of Marxist philosophy, to provide a full of humanistic color in path selection for the proletarian revolution.Lukacs show bear and wisdom as a proletarian revolutionary in this process, but at the same time he was hostile to logos and science and the romantic feelings to revolution future makes his Marxist birthright precarious.Different from Lukacs, Althusser outset identified the concept domain of commodity fetishism, and thus reject its construct meaning for Marx’s ideology. Althusser on the basis of pointed out of the "absolute limits" of Marx’s ideology, reversal horizon define of ideology, creative interpretation in materialized of ideology. More importantly, in this interpretation,the anti-humanism of Althusser’s keynote highlighted the dilemma and passive of subjects, attempt to limit the subjective logic in process of reconstruction ideological substance practicality, and then discussions in an anti-humanistic tone.Althusser original of the genius type to ensure his place in the history of ideology, but his extreme in Marx’s ideology and demotion of the subject undoubtedly go too far, Althusser has thus been controversial.On the whole, Lukacs too much concern to people, subject and consciousness at the same time increased hazy feeling of scientific dimension of his ideology critical theory. Althusser stubborn in science paradigm such as structure and system, thus overlook the subject dimension of Marx’s ideology critique.On the revolutionary path selection and prospects, Lukacs cannot fail to avoid into a suspected of voluntarism and Althusser in this issue shows a kind of objectivism paradigm due to his ideology critical theory ignore the subject initiative,meanwhile, dual dimension of Lukacs and Althusser elucidation of the ideology critical theory in the context of commodity fetishism shows the historical evolution of Western Marxist Philosophy internal logic.