Early Republic Of China Cracks In The Political Struggles Of The Office Su G

After the establishment of the Republic of China, absolute monarchy lasting for 2,000 years in China's system was abolished, democracy and legal institutions are introduced to China. The modern administrative lawsuit and supervisory system is being introduced in the early years of the Republic of China in this period of time. A fusion of Chinese and Western supervisory system - Office of the Su G was founded, it units Chinese tradition inspector-general yard yushi system and western administration public prosecution function. Based on the bonds for the Bali case, Su governance studies the hardship and sufferings in the course of the building of legal system in the early years of the Republic of China by the way of investigation and correction course. The full text consists of three parts.The first part discusses the modern administrative litigation system to introduce China's historical background, to take to the discussion of administrative litigation system, administrative proceedings and, ultimately, the foundation of an independent body-the Executive Yuan. This part mainly discussed the establishment of Su government, operation, functions and complex relationship to the executive office. Su government is part of the Executive office, but it has an independent correction and impeachment right, independent fundamental right. It also supervises the implementation. The relationship between Su government and executive office is similar to that between prosecutors and courts.The second part discusses the various relationships generated by the Bali bonds case. Financial problems in modern China were the main problem for successive governments, issuing bonds was one of its main means. Bali was Nanjing interim government bond issuance of bonds. After Bali bonds were issued, the purchasing power of people was not high. It was claimed as the provincial military spending. Jiangsu Province, claimed later, due to financial difficulties mortgaged the bonds to the Siemens. In 1914 after the purposes of bonds were reported, Jiangsu Province, the Ministry of Finance considered the purposes not clear and suspected invasive, which triggered the Bali bonds. Early Republic of China is shocked by the case, the complexity of the case involving a wide surface, it is rare. Su government officials as the Office of the fundamental institutions of the bomb, the process of the case played a decisive role. This section discusses the origin of the Bali bonds, on the Executive Yuan and Dali Yuan-ping of the case heard by the results of the different legal system from the crisis.The third part analyses complex political relations behind the case and the relationships between Jiangsu Provincial Finance, the Office of governance Su and president Yuan Shikai. Through carding the complex relationships, we can find all the parties involved in the case had different intentions. Jiang Mao-hee, Yuan Shikai in control of national government tried to crack down Cheng Dequan, Ying Dehong and was a deterrent to the JiangZhe forces at the same time. All kinds of complicated reasons deduced the process of the case.Whether Su government belonged to the judiciary or the executive itself is a complex issue. - From the establishment of the Executive Yuan, the identity of the official of the Su government was ensured and had the characteristics of judicial officials. Contradictions in his capacity as the government makes the Office Su difficult positioning.From the correction and impeachment course, we can see complex political and social contradictions. Originally a simple financial case, because of the existence of various political forces, had become complicated and confusing, and eventually to nothing. As a leading government organ in the case, it also failed to play its proper monitoring functions. Although Su government lasted for more than two years, Su G corrected and impeached a large number of violation cases, the politicians at that time played a role in deterring and rectification. However, legislative intent and practical effect often flawed, imperfect Republic of building the legal system, unrestricted expansion of executive power, but also makes it not escape from the fate of other organs of the legal system and became the tools of political control, which was the regret to be history. The paper demonstrates the deep-seated reasons for the reform failure of the legal system, and further explores the complex relationship in the course of its operation to points out the operation limitations.