A Research On The Evaluation Of History

Since the 18th century, Western history follow the concept of modern science, the pursuit of objectivity, in order to make history as an independent discipline status in the scientific concepts laid a solid foundation. More than 100 years and the pursuit of accumulation, in the minds of many historians branded the objective of the deep scars, "truthfully straight." Once pursued by a historian. However, at the time of the scholars also a surging anti-objective and thought, this is a new Kant's Freiburg School, and their representative is Rickert, and Durban. On their value based on the natural and historical distinction between scientific issues, the methodology of science history, the history of the 20th century has had a profound impact.Chinese and Western historians to sort out this article on the evaluation of the value of the exposition as a starting point to further discuss the introduction to the evaluation of the value of history in the cause of many problems, and on a number of solutions were analyzed. In addition to introduction of the article, is divided into five chapters.Introduction of the topics on the academic background of the status quo at home and abroad, and this perspectiveChapter II "What is the history of evaluation." This chapter from three perspectives of "historical evaluation" concept was analyzed. The first two from as awareness, understanding of historical facts and historical understanding of objects in the evaluation of understanding of the meaning, understanding the purpose of understanding the direction and focus, in the form of awareness, awareness of the status and role of different aspects of the second From "historical evaluation of the concept itself of its three significance: the value of original form, shape and extend the value of the value of abstract form; third, from the main value of understanding the status of the object and its understanding of the relationship between the value of proceeding could be history Recognizing the value of cognitive divided into historical value and historical value assessment of two types.Chapter III "History can not be separated from the value of evaluation." In theory, the text of Durban and the history of philosophy Rickert theory that the assessment is the essence of history. In the actual historical research, we can not rule out the historical evaluation, this is not only inconsistent with historical research services for the reality of social practice and the fundamental purposes and will also research the history of the actual loss of the direction, goals and motivation. The history of evaluation in the study of history also has a direct and indirect assessment evaluation in two ways.Chapter IV "historical evaluation of the foundation and core." Any evaluation of a historical understanding of the facts are the first from the beginning, the reality of the research activities, we often can be seen as understanding of the facts unclear, incomplete, leading to a final assessment of that mistake. The measure of value is the historical evaluation of the core measure of value of a final decision on two premises: first, the community's needs and interests of the other is the object, the reality of the nature and the laws.Chapter V "evaluation of the complexity of the history." History is inseparable from the history of evaluation, but also to the evaluation of history has brought problems, historical evaluation of the results of the diversity and variability, the historical differences between the various scales. And the complexity of the historical evaluation of the performance even more: the historical understanding of the value of the main targets, and sometimes is the reality of the community, such as valuation, sometimes the history of the figures, such as the value of cognition; objects of historical value in understanding the value of The main, is the group rather than individual, the historical understanding of the value of a group of understanding, rather than the value of individual awareness of the needs of the main value is multifaceted and multi-level, the immediate needs and long-term needs, the need for major And secondary needs. Needs often can not have both, the historical value in understanding how this multifaceted, multi-level needs, the distinction between their priorities and how to value the needs of the main integrated, understand and grasp the overall, there are considerable difficulties; history Recognizing the value of the special inspection.Chapter VI "history of the dilemma." To evaluate the history of history has brought a dilemma: First, evaluate the impact on the history of objectivity; second, historical evaluation of the difficulties in testing. Against these two issues, Walsh put forward the "King of allocation," Colin Takenori and Walsh also made a similar solution. Both solutions are to a certain extent, weakening the history of objectivity, to achieve the historical evaluation of the test to resolve the difficulties. There are scholars have put forth a historical evaluation of whether the issue of consistency and did a very deep analysis.