The Relationship Research Between The Semantic Grid Of The Relational Small Clause And The Semantic Framework Of The Main Clause

The study of the"relational small clause"started from"Ma Shi Wen Tong", but for modern Chinese scholars, it has only just become a hot spot. This study intended to explore the relationship between kinds of Semantic Grid and the various types of sentence. Semantic Grid and sentence, as between the gears, as in the premise of a fixed one, the other always need to rotate in order to match with. This discussion will be divided into four parts.The first part is introduction. In this section, we summarized the research results about the"relational small clause"of ancient and modern predecessors and classify it by period and angle. After finishing the material, we found there is still some gap about the studies of modern Chinese that deserving of our depth. In this section, we also summarized the lack of our predecessors and found a new angle to go deep into the research, that is to study the extraction of various semantic grid on the basis of the relationship between the"relational small clause"and"the relational main clause".In chapter II, we "semantic grid gear" for a fixed starting point for research. We first pointed out five kinds of semantic grid that commonly used, that is, Agentive (A), Objective Georgia (O), Instrumental (I), the Locative (L), and factitive (F). Then, we analyze the way of how the semantic grid go into various kinds of sentence by expecting examples. We found that not all the semantic grid can freely enter a variety of sentence.even if going into a certain sentence, it will also have some limitations. For example, when we make Objective Grid [- life] go into a agentive sentence, it can only go into the doer variant sentence structure as a subject, but opposite when we make Objective Grid [+ life] N. These laws have been done a detailed description and demonstration In the text except the Judge sentence?, because of it,s flexibility. So we put it in the last part of he chapter as a deeper complement.Chapter III is as important as Chapter II. It is a continuation of the second chapter, that is to clear the semantic grid that can go into sentences on the basis of the conclusion of Chapter II. Then we illustrate how the semantic grid go into sentences with 1-2 examples. With this formation process, the semantic framework has changed. We first find the most simple formula, and then further extended to check which semantic grid can go into the semantic framework. In fact, this is associated with Valence Theory. Usually there is a one valence verb? at least of the V1,V2 in the most simple semantic framework. But as the core of our research is not the verb valence?, there is no further information about this topic in the paper.Chapter IV is the conclusion part summarizing the ideas and results of the paper.