Font Size: a A A

Between The "Unique I" And "Class I"

Posted on:2011-06-28Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:C Y ZhengFull Text:PDF
GTID:2155360305991539Subject:Marxist philosophy
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Since generated, the modern Subject faced many problems, but it had hastily walken on the road because it is not enough time to seriously reflect on itself with the increasingly urgent task to enlightenment. This "deficiencies" led to the Subject could not cut off all the ambiguous link with feudal theology.In this case, the Subject either sought to asylum of God, or made themself directly became into the gods, which made the Subject carried a strong religious universality and devoured its special individual dimension, in Descartes, Kant, Hegel, Feuerbach's philosophy, none is not like that. Stirner awared the inherent limitations of this Subject theory, and forced to cut off all the Subject's contact with the theology, he attempted to liberate the Subject, publicized the unique and individuality. But at the same time, he pulled the special and self-sustaining of Subject into the other extreme, resulting in the increasing emptiness of the Subject.Marx uncovered the ideological trick of the modern Subject theory, he found that the antinomy of modern Subject theory stems from antinomy of real life world. in the conditions of capitalist society, along with abolition of the feudal hierarchy and the physical systems, it led to separation and confrontation of civil society and the State, private life and class life, The real reflected into the ideas, and reflected into the Subject theory,which formed abstract opposition of "Classâ… " Subject and the "uniqueâ… " Subject. Started from this theoretical critical perspective, Marx abolished all forms of the Subject metaphysical, then expand the foundation of Subject research into the field of social practice, and with the reality of social and material production as the base, Marx walked on a road between "Class I" and "unique I",which was different from the modern Subject. Marx found that, in modern society, due to the specific capitalist "materialization" of economic relations, the Subject was neither really "everyone" which like the enlightenment thinkers said, nor purely "unique I" like Stirner emphasized, and the Subject only could be proletariat which stayed deeply into the core of modern mass production, and emerged as the "groups".Since the practical features of the basic theory position of Marx, making it is very different from the "communicating" Subject theory in the modern Western, which is committed to communicate the universality and particularity dimension of the Subject. Meanwhile, in depth interpretation of Marx's Subject ideas, it will bring a series of enlightenment for the Subject problem study in our country.
Keywords/Search Tags:Subject, Ideology, Practice, Proletariat, Communication
PDF Full Text Request
Related items