Font Size: a A A

A Six-side Perspective Of DPRK'S Nuclear Crisis

Posted on:2005-03-08Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:J J ZhuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2156360125969361Subject:International relations
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
DPRK's Nuclear Crisis is one of the most important things in contemporary international relations and china's diplomacy. DPRK is one of the most important neighbors to china. Being a.responsible rising country, china has been active to make contributions to solve the crisis. It refers to china's great power diplomacy and neighbor countries diplomacy and affects the process of china's peaceful rising.The crisis has a long history. It is not accidental for it to happen once more. There are at least three reasons. First of all, America's diplomacy, especially Bush administration's offensive containment policy should be responsible for the crisis mostly.Secondly, DPRK's nuclear borderline policy also attributes to the outbreak of it.Lastly, the interactions between America and DPPK accelerate the process of the urgent confrontation.It is a simple and useful way to analyze one country's diplomacy with rational choice theory and national interest. The major sides of the nuclear crisis are U.S.A and DPPK, but it actually refers to the interests of other four countries. So it is necessary to know the strategy of each side relating to the crisis. In U.S.A, the essence of the crisis is the conflict between America's hegemony and DPRK's sovereignty. In Japan, the crisis offers a good chance to develop military arments and increase political influence. In ROK, the crisis is one of the most difficult problems to deal with, which needs the balance between "Alliance of U.S.A-ROK" and "Unity of DPPK-ROK". In Russia, it is a good choice to attend the crisis to get rid of the imbalance of national and international situation.Finally in china, the crisis has much to do with the national interests of politics economics and security. So we should try our bestto make contributions to solve the crisis with our particular advantages. There are three obstacles at least in solving the crisis. One is the imbalance of international politics structure in Northeast Asia, another is the imbalance of diplomatic relations structure in the Korean peninsula. The third is the imbalance of the 1953 Armistice Regime. In order to conquer these difficulties, we should continue to hold the six-side Beijing conference, abandon the cold war thoughts completely, foster cooperative security ideas, and establish the multilateral security mechanism in Northeast Asia.
Keywords/Search Tags:DPRK's Nuclear Crisis, Rational Choice Theory, Security Dilemma, Cooperative Security
PDF Full Text Request
Related items