Examine The Bureaucracy

Practice of public administration needs to be understanding and knowledge of theory,for which theory of administrative reform needs to be designed and guidance. As the role of government in economic life increases the importance of government functions has been more and more theoretical understanding ,government action is perhaps more significant impact on the economy, which followed by government administration mode is triggered more criticism and blame. As the core operation of modern public administration building block, since the birth of the bureaucratic system has been widespread concern in social science and function which lead to controversy. These differences perspectives on the support or criticism have rational side, while these debates are constantly push forward the development of bureaucracy.80 years since the 20th century, to "abandon the bureaucracy"as the slogan of the new public management theory as the main mode of the "post-bureaucratic system " paradigm of the rise of the West set off a market-oriented reform of public administration into a wave of Reform of bureaucracy in general has taken on critical and negative attitude, meanwhile ,bureaucratic administration in the rationality of post-industrial era has been widely questioned. Correspondingly, which mainly in terms of administrative structures and administrative means, that is, the traditional model of public administration reform. Theory of bureaucratic administration is not just about the theory of administrative organization, but the theory of administrative behavior. In this sense, the traditional model of public administration can be described as bureaucratic administration model. This means that the orientation of reform want to create a system beyond the traditional bureaucratic type of administrative model of public management paradigm. In front of this trend, the traditional paradigm of bureaucratic administration, especially as its theoretical basis Theory of Bureaucracy and what academic attitude? If we simply follow the so-called "post-bureaucratic" administration paradigm, on the theory of bureaucratic administration, and abandoned a negative attitude is not serious and extremely unwise.Theory of bureaucratic administration within a reasonable - legitimacy as the starting point in the analysis of "post-bureaucratic" administration paradigm there are some advantages at the same time, revealing its bureaucracy to criticize the substance of administrative model, and then come to bureaucracy Administration paradigm in public administration in modern society there is the rationality and necessity: Concrete can be divided into several parts. The first part of the administrative bureaucracy is to introduce two paradigms: Wilson's "politics - administration"separation of the administrative paradigm and Weber's Rational Bureaucracy administration paradigm. By analyzing these two bureaucratic administrative model and the main features of the basic connotation, bureaucracy has been reached on the basic understanding of administrative theory. Then Weber's rational bureaucracy of focus, detailing the existence of bureaucracy in the form of rational and reasonable and legality. Furthermore it points out that the rational bureaucratic system in the superiority of administration. This article describes the second part of "post-bureaucratic" administration paradigm the meaning of several major theoretical models, features, and improving public administration mode of thought to achieve the "post-bureaucratic system " to learn more about the administration. The third part discusses the "post-bureaucratic" administration paradigm of criticism of bureaucratic administration point of view, careful analysis of the criticisms of the substance. The fourth part of the draw in the modern bureaucratic administrative model of society is indispensable.Discussion of this article can be found, that public administration scholars put forward a series of "post-bureaucratic" administrative model of bureaucratic administration model of efficiency and democracy raised doubts and negative, distorted the essence of bureaucracy. In a sense, public choice theory, new public management theory and administrative theory and other theories of democracy on the criticism of bureaucracy in fact refers to the "real existence as a bureaucracy or government, "the criticism. This criticism, "the fact that starting from the experience, the results of empirical observations the concept of building on the empirical fact accused the deviation. This is a serious departure from Weber's 'ideal type ' methodology - the legal type of authority, and bureaucracy is the Chief of Commenced under this methodology, which is irresponsible criticism in a way. "...