Font Size: a A A

Conflics And Balance Between Clectronic Surveilance And Privacy In Public

Posted on:2012-05-02Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:H Y WangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2166330335470648Subject:Civil law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
With the rapid development of science and technology, a variety of high-tech electronic equipment to an unstoppable momentum of influx of people's lives. In recent years, electronic monitoring system is even more rapid development, especially in the use of a wide range of public places. It is in the maintenance of public order, protect public safety, maintain traffic order, and improve work efficiency and economic benefits has played a huge role. However, electronic monitoring is also mandatory because of its unilateral privacy of citizens suspected of infringement, which led to the installation of electronic surveillance in public places, and the conflict between privacy. However, technological change is unstoppable, we can not because of its threat to privacy right to deny its role to the extreme. Electronic monitoring in itself is neutral, its "evil" depends on its users and use. We can only strengthen the effective supervision of legal and other measures to guide it, hold it in, making it the direction toward the benefit of mankind.Remove this introduction and conclusion, the main text is divided into four parts. The first part of the installation of electronic surveillance in public places is reasonable and right to privacy conflict. Installation of electronic surveillance in public places from the feasibility analysis of the reasonableness and necessity of the installation of electronic surveillance in public places and privacy conflict situation, causes and types. The second part of the installation of electronic surveillance in public places on the legislative status and limitations. The third part of foreign experience. Through analysis of the jurisprudence of the United States looking for U.S. citizen privacy in public places but also of relevant experience in industry self-regulation model of the United States and the German experience in the relevant legislation. The fourth part is the electronic surveillance in public places and privacy balanced approach. Drawing on foreign experience, based on legislation, law enforcement and law-abiding public the angle of installation of electronic surveillance and privacy balanced approach. Legislative measures, including amending the Constitution, and improve the draft Civil Code and the draft Law on the Protection of personal information; enforcement measures including the establishment of professional law enforcement personnel and norms in electronic surveillance police building model; law-abiding citizens the right to privacy include increasing awareness and encourage citizens to use legal means to safeguard their own legitimate rights, called on people self-discipline and initiative information control personal information protection industry self-regulation. Discussed in four parts, the second part and the fourth part is the key part of this article.In this paper, a comparative analysis, data analysis, semantic analysis, logic analysis and other research methods, from a legal point of efforts to find effective solutions to install electronic surveillance in public places and privacy the way the conflict and made a little immature solutions to problems, to regulate electronic surveillance in order to contribute their modest means. Meanwhile, the expected improvement of the system through the promotion of economic progress and social harmony.
Keywords/Search Tags:Public Places, Electronic Monitoring, Privacy
PDF Full Text Request
Related items