Font Size: a A A

Reflection On Disputes About Crime Of Mediating Acceptance Of Bribes

Posted on:2006-02-09Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X LuoFull Text:PDF
GTID:2166360152985092Subject:Criminal Law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Article 388 of the latest Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, which is theoretically called crime of mediating acceptance of bribes, prescribes:"Any State functionary who,by taking advantage of his own functions and powers or position , secures illegitimate benefits for an entrusting person through another State functionary's performance of his duties and extorts from the entrusting person or accepts the entrusting person's money or property shall be regarded as guilty of acceptance of bribes and punished for it."    In view of complications of prerequisites of an objective act of the crime of acceptance of bribes and necessities of fighting corruption , Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate , in the year of 1989, made a further explanation for the crime of acceptance of bribes concerning taking advantage of the position in Solutions to A Number of Problems about 'Supplementary Provisions Concerning the Punishment of Crimes of Embezzlement and Bribery' .The said explanation states that taking advantage         of the position in committing the crime of acceptance of bribes refers to taking advantage of the functions and powers or advantages concerning the position ; that functions and powers refer to those any State functionary is entitled to ; that taking advantage of the advantages of the position refers to the fact that any State functionary takes advantage of his own functions and powers or position instead of exercising his own functions and powers directly ; and that any State functionary who , by taking advantage of his own functions and powers or position , secures illegitimate benefits for an entrusting person through another State functionary's performance of his duties and extorts from the entrusting person or accepts the entrusting person's money or property shall be regarded as guilty of acceptance of bribes and punished for it . On the basis of the said 'Solutions to A Certain Number of Problems', having drawn lessons from law-making examples in many foreign countries and having summarized helpful experience resulting from long-time judicial practice in our country, the Criminal Law revised in 1997 gives a more explicit prescription of the crime of acceptance of bribes in Article 388. As a special state of guilt of acceptance of bribes, the crime of mediating acceptance of bribes shares with the general crime of acceptance of bribes the same criminal objects, criminal subjects and subjective desires in committing an offense, except objective prerequisites of crime. Objective prerequisites of the crime of mediating acceptance of bribes concretely display that the person committing the crime takes advantage of influence of his functions and powers or position, but his offense is finally brought about by the mediatee's performance of his duties ; that the mediator of the crime secures for an entrusting person illegitimate benefits instead of legitimate ones, or he will not be charged with such an offense, that is to say , the crime of mediating acceptance of bribes exists only in case of taking bribes and bending the law ; and that as far as the crime is concerned, the way of accepting bribes as well as extorting bribes must be founded on the prerequisite of securing illegitimate benefits for an entrusting person . Since an objective act determines the nature of a crime, the crime of mediating acceptance of bribes  is of relatively independent significance in judicial practice . The problem of the crime of mediating acceptance of bribes is worth paying attention to after the current Criminal Law came into effect. There often exist a lot of cases of the crime with different judgments, which result from the ambiguity of the law and from the disputes in theory about the definition and subjects of the crime of mediating acceptance of bribes, about the relationship between mediators and mediatees , and about the prerequisites of illegitimate benefits. The paper, in accordance with the prescription of the crime of mediating acceptance of bribes in the current Criminal Law, synthesizes the ideas of different scholars about the above-mentioned disputes and elaborates writer's personalized thought, which is supposed to contribute towards a further research and judicial practice in the crime of mediating acceptance of bribes.
Keywords/Search Tags:Reflection
PDF Full Text Request
Related items