Professional administrative monopoly and its governance is one of the cutting-edge research in the field of China's socialist market-oriented process, also the focus of China's political system and economic reform, therefore, it has a strong theoretical value and practical significance to research professional administrative monopoly and its control measures.This paper aims at revealing the nature of professional administrative monopoly, handling unreasonable professional administrative monopoly correctly through detailed analysis of the existence and differences of professional administrative monopoly in three countries-China,Britain and the United States, and giving suggestions on further governance of China's professional administrative monopoly by comparing control measures and effects on professional administrative monopoly among three countries. Both of Britain and America have relatively complete market economy and sound legal system. This paper used a variety of analysis methods including data analysis, analysis of laws and regulations, qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis.In this paper, there may be three innovations through comparison:First, the innovation of research viewpoint. At present, foreign study on administrative monopoly is very limited and domestic research about basic theory of administrative monopoly is increasing, but less of systematic study from the perspective of comparison on professional administrative monopoly among countries.Second, the innovation of research contents. On the basic of the new perspective, the article included professional administrative monopoly exists or not in foreign, the root of the presence or absence and their similarities or differences ,as well as microscopic efficiency loss analysis of professional administrative monopoly in China and the comparison on control measures, summed up experience and lessons from these countries, finally, obtained some inspirations and provided the direction for governing professional administrative monopoly in China.Third, the innovation of research conclusions. The one, further evidence of professional administrative monopoly in developed countries which still used administrative monopoly in some areas; the other, there are differences at performance in three countries because of the development level and political system. Compared with developed countries, China's administrative monopoly is more complicated and serious, its governance has become extremely hard; the last, government regulation caused professional administrative monopoly in developed countries, they have taken appropriate measures to control it and achieved some results, so it is necessary to learn from their experiences and lessons, and then put forward measures for our professional administrative monopoly.
|