The Study Of Major Administrative Decision-making Hearings

As a result of China's administrative decision-making system by the traditional thinking of the impact of official position, there are a lot of shortcomings, in practice, the blind and arbitrary decision-making is common, resulting in a lot of wrong decisions and mistakes in decision-making. Correct decision-making is the work of an important prerequisite for the smooth conduct, and not when the decision-making and mistakes in decision-making to the national economy and the vital interests of the people brought great damage to the whole society should attach great importance. " Policy-making organs at all levels should improve the major decision-making rules and procedures, the establishment of social conditions and popular sentiments reflect the system the establishment and the interests of the masses of the major issues are closely related to social systems and social public hearing system, and improve the system of expert consultation, the implementation of the verification system of decision-making and accountability, to prevent arbitrary decision-making. "hearing a major executive decision-making refers to making the relationship between the executive authorities social and public interest before a major decision, the representatives and the participation of experts and scholars to meet, listen to and consider the views of relevant, on the basis of a decision to promote the democratization of decision-making and scientific system of procedures. Major administrative hearing is to improve decision-making rules and procedures for major policy decisions of the important system is conducive to scientific and democratic decision making, standardization, and is also effective in preventing arbitrary decision-making and blindness; At the same time will also help to improve the level of political participation of citizens and to protect their power; are conducive to enhancing the transparency of decision-making.This paper describes the major administrative decision-making theoretical knowledge of the hearing after a major executive decision-making hearing on the basic principles to be followed. The third part of the method of comparative analysis of the use of relevant research at home and abroad are analyzed, in some places has been published on the implementation of a major executive decision-making to compare the contents of the hearing, in order to identify their deficiencies and should be affirmed where, at the same time throughout the analysis of the major executive decision-making based on the hearing, pointing out that problems in practice. The fourth part of the status quo for the third part of that major legislative and administrative decision-making practice of hearing defects and deficiencies, combined with the theory put forward specific, targeted measures to improve.