| The law has been produced in the process of social development, and has been close associated with the social life. As a legal practice, justice has become closer and closer to the social life. To observe the administration of justice, we should be close to the judicial practice and start from the social life of the actual situation. Therefore, the author based on works from the actual situation, paid attention to the interaction between today's public and judicial issues, explored both the "natural" and "real likelihood" through the district court's angle of view, and then made a preliminary definition of the existence of the two conflict situations standing on the basis of the questionnaire survey carrying on the parties to cases - the public and counting the court's trial situation. It can be founded that there are many reasons for the role of co-product the contradiction between justice and the public if we carefully examine the discord between them, and it is the judicial status quo under the backgrounds of China in transition play the key role that put the positive interaction between the Public and justice under restraint. In the light of this, in the process of discovery of the problem and search for countermeasures, the author paid more attention to the efforts that should be done by justice. In addition to a brief description of the macro aspects of the initiative, the author analyzed what current district courts should do includes the following two aspects: One is based on the people, enhance the professional quality of judges and the judges' personal charm; the second is, with a view to promoting positive interaction between justice and the public, current district courts should proceed in the cases, to meet the needs of the value of the public, for the public to be convinced with the process and outcome of the judicial, so that contributing to the credibility of the judiciary and the public to comply with the administration of justice. |