| Kant a priori pure cognitive interpretation of the concept is one of the most obscure part of Kant’s philosophy. This part of the deduction has two versions. Argument category with finishing intuitive Heteropoly to form the ability of knowledge, the core problem that the category of the legitimacy and rationality basis are two version of common concern. To a certain extent understand category deduction, hand on the need to separately to the original reading, on the other hand, the comparison and combination of the two version, found that the different point and the common ground in order to achieve the whole part of the theory of the main points of the grasp. By reading the discovery, although two version in demonstration of the disciplinary perspectives, on the difference between Transcendental Apperception launched the analysis and interpretation of the style of the original intention and so on, but the rationality in the basic topic categories, namely legitimacy problem but is completely consistent. The two edition of deduction in many aspects show did not affect the total of the differences, it is because the analysis and investigation on the differences and connections that have a more profound understanding of transcendental deduction theory.In common, can be found a link between the two version hub -"Transcendental Apperception" existence. In the first edition of "Transcendental Apperception", is based on Heteropoly capability gives intuitionistic to a priori conditions, with pure, origin and constant awareness in the process of knowledge formation and was put out, it is the highest level of cognitive ability. The second version is no direct mention of the claim, but can be obviously found in version second is not mentioned and demonstrated every hour and moment in this kind of things. This last conclusion second version even directly from the first edition demonstrated as a starting point, to analyze and explain the transcendental apperception. The performance of interpretation in the concept of "connectivity" has the function of comprehensive unity principle, comprehensive and unified theory source of apperception description and apperception is all use intellectual the supreme principle of the show, is just behind the Transcendental Apperception theory appeared in the first edition of the further sublimation, so it is also for the breakthrough the two edition of deductive connection. On the other hand, in the face of the two edition of the difference, the author attempts from the connection between the two version has the interpretation of the Transcendental Apperception as the breakthrough point, through the contrast in the two version of transcendental deduction which links and the inherent logic relation of different aspects, we found that different argument method point and argument of the existence of two edition deduction. Therefore, select the "Transcendental Apperception" as a starting point of two edition deductive relation is best choice.This paper try to tracing the Transcendental Apperception theory in history, can be back to the earliest have similar cognitive ability of Aristotle’s form, then the Cartesian "I think" and use Leibniz’s discussion of monadic when "apperception". Of course, one of the maturity of this theory is Kant’s Transcendental Apperception, and function and the definition of Kant’s Transcendental Apperception are introduced briefly. Secondly, explaining why the choice of Transcendental Apperception as the breakthrough point. Followed by the specific comparison method, is writing to the two edition of deductive argumentation mode and the breakthrough point, find the difference. At the same time found two version also exists between many links, such as the common argument purpose and objective etc. Finally, the two editions of the interpretation of the significance and the theory of internal contradiction in the whole Kantian philosophy was evaluated, as well as a brief critique of transcendental apperception. |
PDF Full Text Request