Jacques Ronsier 's Art - Criticism Of Political Practice Theory

Since the structuralism to break subjectivity has become the focus of the theoretical circle, Althusser is the one who representatives of this idea. Foucault continues to think along the Althusser’s path to think, and he also solve the problems resulting from Althusser.He break the theme of Althusser subjectification and transform to another proposition. Jacques Ranciere go along wih the foucault’s thought and in his view the process of emancipation is the process of subjectity, which he using a different word-"political" to express. Jacques Ranciere make the distribution of the sensible of modern art as a means of subjectivity, and art which empowering people to enjoy the distribution of the sensible euqalily to practice the "political". Thus art itself is actually "politics" in practice. With this idea, Jacques Ranciere is not only try to find a way out for the art, but also to find feasible solutions in postmodern "politics".Jacques Ranciere try to expain his thought with art. Jacques Ranciere think the novel undertake the heavy task to make the life of fragmented world to repoeticizing. That is because in the world of the novel, eyeryone and eyerything can be the role of the story, there is no distinction between high and low,noble and humble.They resist the authority of the author who try to arranged them, so they can to distribution of sensible their own. World is made up of infinity of images, life is not about the story.The cinima camera with its absolute initiative to record the apperance of the world directly.The cinima can show the truth of the world essencely, whicn can make the images much more real. The cinima refused the director or scriptor to arrange a story for image, they hope to be able to tell their story purely. The freely aesthetic of art refused to be arranged, they always try to break the traditional ideas, provide people sensible different from ordinary daily life experience, which stimulates people to questions the existing life, and finally realize distribution fo sensible.Aesthetic of art gives people wider space to imagination and perceptual, inspire different perception, make the invisible become visible, unsayble become sayble. And once the anonymous images emerge, they realized the distribution of the sensible, and realize the subjectivity of self position. Since the west Mr Lang think "politics" is about a conflict, is a conflict between different perception, is cannot see conflict with visible this, so obviously meet at this level and political art, is the "political aesthetics" or "political aesthetics".With the analysis of the art Jacques Ranciere ultimately wants to make clear that regime of aesthetic art challenge boundaries of the art itself, bring new impetus to the development of art,and at the same time, also can provide certain reference for our life as well. But as to what to do, Jacques Ranciere does not give a rules, it’s like what he’s do in the paper,never try to tell the others what shuld do and how to do it.Believe that equality of intelligence will give each of us petential to has our own perception, and we will certainly to distribution of sensible on our own.