Font Size: a A A

On The Mechanism Of Public Opinion In Court

Posted on:2014-07-10Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Z J LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2176330392963872Subject:Law
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
With the development of economy and social, China hasbecome the country with the largest internet users of the world.By the end of2012, the number of internet users of China hasreached564million, including420million mobile users. Thenetwork media has become main media of communication inour society, which covers the widest area and spreads fastest.The emergence of new medias gives public the opportunity toparticipate in the political and administrative managementaffairs more freely and directly and thoroughly.With the progress of the democracy and legal construction,the improvement of the citizens’ legal consciousness andaccomplishment, more and more people could participate injudiciary. The public communicate with the people’s courtwith the use of internet media. However, for the sake of thechanges of the environment of public opinions and mediasystem, the judicial authority has been weakened by the publicseriously. Because of the distempered law and the diversethought of the society, internet users evaluate the people’scourt casually, scientific and randomly. The people’s courtshould make a full use of the network, which is convenient,interactive, easy to spread, to consciously accept the supervision of public, to secure the people’s right ofacknowledge, to participate in, to supervise public affairs. Inthe meantime, the people’s court should stick to the justice andshouldn’t be affected by public opinion. The duty of thepeople’s courts is to advocate to obey the law, to punish illegalactivities, to regulate the behavior of the network users, and toset up the judicial authority.In addition to the introduction, the main body of this articleincludes three chapters. The first chapter is mainly about “thecourt clerk abusing his wife”. The environment of public opinionand media pattern is in a mess. The second chapter aim toanalysis the reason of the court will be overwhelmedby network public sentiment. The third chapter is mainly tosolve the problem of the people’s court, i.e. how to respond tonetwork public opinion.
Keywords/Search Tags:public opinion related legality, public opinionon internet, the response system
PDF Full Text Request
Related items