On The Conflict And Adjustment Of Public Opinion Supervision And Judicial Independence

Supervision by public opinion is vital to curb judicial corruption and maintenance of justice, but in real life, the rapid development of public opinion (especially the media), has an aggression on the independence of the judicature. Supervision by public opinion for a good ideas such as fairness and justice is people express a way, and pay attention to the law is in accordance with the law and the content of the program to follow the law. Although both on the purpose is to achieve social fairness and justice, but the differences in implementation means, its position led to the conflict of the two.In the present, our country’s judicial independence and supervision by public opinion of conflicting events still have happened,"The case of Peng Yu","The case of Zhang Jinzhu","The case of Sun Zhigang" and so on. However, we cannot because the discord instead of any other party. We should not only see the supervision of public opinion to the judicial role, it can prevent the judicial corruption, maximize the realization of justice, but also to see the judicial effect on the security of public opinion, it can better ensure the implementation of freedom of public opinion. Both are provided in the constitution of the rights, how to adapt both to the coordinate and promote each other, in order to realize the party’s18th conference proposed "to establish and perfect the supervision system", is our urgent need to solve.This article is divided into four parts, the first part introduces the present situation of the supervision by public opinion and judicial independence, to an analysis of the causes of a conflict between the two cases in the practice. The second part introduced the supervision of public opinion and judicial independence their meanings and characteristics of the specific analysis of supervision by public opinion and judicial independence the fundamental cause of the contradiction and points out the importance of the adjustment of both; The third part analyses the main methods of all countries in the world, summarizes the successful experience of various countries. The fourth part the author tries to suggest coordination between conflict in our country, promoting the construction of democratic rule of law in our country.