| It is a doubtless fact that the overall burdens of Chinese peasants are heavy.The party and national leader have already consumed the massive painstaking care for it. Many scholars also proposed a large number of valuable opinions from different aspects to the matte,but the result is not actually optimal.With the end of "state grain and national tax",all of the people are immersed in jubilation and rejoicing,and forecast that "the non-burden ideal society" is on the horizon.Admittedly,it is undisputable for the people to yearn for the dawn of tax cancellation,but the facts tell us that the agricultural tax cancellation is by no means equal to the end of peasants' burdens.On the one hand,when the agricultural tax became history,the peasants still have to face the awkward situation, which is,several times as the volumes of agricultural tax,the scissors gap between the price of agricultural product and industrial product;On the other hand,with the end of agricultural tax,the peasants immediately confront the overall large scale rigidity price rising of agricultural material and articles for daily use.Where are the matters?The famous economist Amartya K.Sen had pointed out in Poverty and Famine,"We generally consider what are in our real life only rather than who are governing them."â‘ Actually,we are always seeing the superficial phenomenon.As long as,in fact,we contrast the constitution of peasants' burdens before-and-after tax cancellation,can we find without difficulty that tax cancellation is actually,to the most extent,dominant burdens that are small volumes and belong to the controllable scope,while for the recessive burdens,which are larger volumes and our peasants feel more serious,are basically remained untouched.On the contrary,the gap between the limitation of grain price rise and the infinity of crops planting cost increase is encroaching on the advantages which are brought by various favorable-peasant policies.It indicates that the sole agricultural tax cancellation is by no means a permanent solution to the mater.It is the fact that the Chinese peasants' burdens are heavy,but the matters,actually,are not burdens themselves.Looked from economic,burdens are the ratio of income and expense. If looked from politics,burdens are actually the uncoordinated relationship between rights and duties and the inevitable results of unbalance between rights and duties.Liang Qiehao has said,"people have two essential factors,one is life,the other is right.Anyone who lacks any essential factor can not to be called as people."~â‘¡To trace the history,after the foundation of the People's Republic of China in 1949,China has established a highly concentrated planned economy system.Along with it was an unprecedented binary society structure in which the cities and countries are separated in a unified sovereign state.For more than 50 years,the peasants have lost the basic rights which the constitution had entrusted to and become the second-class citizens whose rights are limited and deprived in a series of policies and system arrangements with prejudice and discrimination.Human rights And Civil rights Manifesto of France in 1789 once wrote,"Unknowing the human rights,neglecting the human rights or despising the human rights is the only reason of the public unfortunate and the government corruption." To apply this speech,we also may say,unknowing the human rights, neglecting the human rights and then cause the rights depriving is the basic reason of the Chinese peasants' burdens.Therefore,the author prominently emphasized a core viewpoint is the matter of Chinese peasants' burdens is,from an essential aspect,the matter of rights,which is rooting from the poverty of peasants' rights and opportunities.We should reexamine this matter when we are in the comprehensive construction of well-off society.The burdens just like grass,it is inevitably "reliving after the spring breeze blowing" if we cut the grass without cutting its root.Doubtlessly,it is nonsense to advocate lightening the burdens of peasants based on the status of second-class citizens.It can be asserted that only the peasants' rights have been obtained respect,safeguard and realization can the matter of peasants' burdens be grasped the root and be readily solved.Therefore,the latter agricultural tax age should firstly become the age of peasants' rights,the return, growth,consummation and expansion of the peasants' economy rights,political rights, and social rights should become the main melody of the age.And only in the peasants' rights age,the matter of burdens lightening and income increasing can be basically solved and the harmonious and magnificent new countries can come true from the plans.The paper is divided into five parts,it has introduced the related background of the paper in the introduction,including such as the background of topic selection,the purpose and the significance,the present research situation and the evaluation,the analysis methods,the major point of this paper and so on.After this part,in the second part of the paper,it has carried on profound and comprehensive perspective and elaboration for the current situation of the peasants' burdens,preparing for the theoretical prepare for the following origin analysis.The third part has given comprehensive analysis for the original causes of the peasants' burdens.In this part,with the methods of authority analysis and game playing analysis as the main analysis methods,the author has drawn the related conclusions.This paper concluded that the Chinese peasants' rights depriving is the root of serious peasants' burdens.And all of these are coming from the long-time implementation and solidification of a series of government policies and systems in countries with obvious prejudice and discrimination.Based on these,the author stood on the aspect of government in the fourth part of the paper,regarded the real empowerment of the peasants as a turning point,proposed some related countermeasures and suggestions and anticipated all of these could give a hand to the solution of the current peasants' burdens.The fifth part is the conclusion of the paper.The author stated these with individual comprehension and hopes. |