"17 Years" Period Of Literary Criticism Stylistic Research

Studying on the literary criticism of the "17 years"period, this dissertation discusses the literary criticism literary style of this period's wholesome characteristics, mainly on four aspects: collocation , structure characteristic, rhetoric strategy, saying mode. On collocation, this dissertation analyzes the criticism's concrete representation and characteristic through the political commentary body type, editor's words, endings. We point out that the literary criticism of the "17 years" period uses the political commentary to explain the literature problems, and usually embodied in specific issue, meeting report, commentator's article and short comments. The high frequency of the leaderette and ideological ending is an important representation of this writing type. Exactly because of the political commentary style of this period's literary criticism , it potentially has a distinguishing feature of elenchus. At that time, many concrete commentary article aimed at the "wrong direction" of literature creations. This dissertation also analyzes the rhetoric strategy and saying mode of the "17 years" period. In debates, to show " mistake" of the opposition party, the exaggeration are frequently used. Lots of parallel construction and rhetorical question are used to create huge threatening force to express the accuracy of the main stream words. The language characteristic of the literary criticism of "17 years"is an important part of this period's literary criticism. This dissertation discusses this criticism's terminology, tone and "the worker, peasant and soldier" style. Moreover, this text still discusses the existence of the other writing type opposite to the main stream: scrabble and gossipy. They are responses of the intellectual who cling to the times to this period and also are breakthroughs to the main stream criticism's words. We can see a obvious clue throughout the literary criticism of this period, it is struggle. It's characteristic is an inevitable outcome in this circumstance. In the ending, the dissertation discuss the meaning of the literary criticism of the "17 years" period to the contemporary literary criticism.