Virtue And Order

The time of Aristotle which gentleman Dude lives, the city-state and is different with our present's country, it has included the society and the political two aspects, is political community which ethics and politics unify. In a such political community, its goal is must make the citizen excessively fine life, lets the city-state realize the highest friendliness. Based on a such main key, ethics undertook has taken political a final home to return to such role. Along with the historical development and the time request, politics and ethics separate gradually, has undertaken own role respectively, and reciprocity. Then, the citizen has how between the moral excellence and do the political order's relations undergo in the gentleman Dude's work in Aristotle 's are present?The regime, the citizen and the civic education is appears along with the national appearance, is by the national nature decided that if wants to realize the political order stable and Uygur continues is needs to have the political moral excellence citizen to maintain. The citizen has the political rights person, is not same along with the different regime formal notion. The citizen concept equivocal possibilities are Aristotle person of great strength Dude in the civic education thought one of ambiguity reasons.Aristotle thought that person's ultimate good is the fine life and the happy life, the human should have the ultimate good personal character, also realizes the noble soul personal character, is also "the justice, the wisdom, controls bravely with", these moral excellence are ethics moral excellence, it is different with the political moral excellence, this kind of moral excellence has the sociality, but does not look like the political moral excellence to have the political nature and the class nature. These so-called ethics moral excellence in the ideal city-state neutral politics moral excellence is consistent, under the habit regime and the abnormal regime, is different along with the regime shape.The civic education takes the trained qualified citizen's method, it serves politics, has the class nature, therefore its duty is trains the citizen to have the moral excellence which political order Uygur continues needs. Aristotle wants the fusion ethics and politics, but through to the different regime's analysis, he discovers in many situations is impossible to fuse. Regime's Uygur continues needs citizen's political moral excellence, but does not need citizen's ethics moral excellence, These two concepts have not differentiated in Aristotle there, this definitely will cause in his civic education thought to present the contradiction and the different meanings.This article is for the purpose of through the analysis different regime's under citizen moral excellence and the political order relations, what relations solves and takes the social basic members as community's fundamental element citizens between the person to have? The citizen moral excellence genial person moral excellence is whether consistent? Such question, presents Asia by this to undergo in the gentleman Dude's civic education thought paradox and the contradiction.The article altogether divides into four parts:The first part: Premise work. The article subject is discusses between the order and US and Germany's relations, therefore clarifies between political and ethics relations is very important moreover is the premise work moreover is the article difficulty. In Aristotle time, politics and ethics are unify, ethics is its political foundation together, is also the goal which it must realize finally, but because this unity enabled the moral excellence to have abstractness. Of along with the historical development and the need, in the modern country theory, politics and ethics separate gradually, also had division explicit political moral excellence and ethics moral excellence about the moral excellence division. Therefore, must certainly involve in this part the related moral excellence conceptual analysis to be clear, this is behind the chapter writing premise.The second part: to regime, citizen and civic education analysis. Aristotle maintenance slavery thought has the seriou Aristotle ' s class nature, therefore he has the flaw to the regime and the citizen concept's limits, since is indefinite as the political community's main body concept, therefore requests as the city-state whether the citizen moral excellence genial person's moral excellence does have the uniformity? Aristotle through to six kind of different regime's analyses, the conclusion which obtains is under the ideal regime which under some kind of regime is also he thought that two kind of moral excellence are consistent.The third part: Ideal city-state civic education. Is mainly writes the civic education in this part the goal, the way and the principle, but through the analysis, may see, already had the paradox in the ideal city-state's civic education.The fourth part: This is the article key point, through the analysis under the habit regime and the abnormal regime's different civic education, obtains the ambiguity which and the contradiction its civic education thought itself exists.