Media Supervision And Judicial Activities In A Number Of Thinking

The same value objective between media and justice is impartial. But there are also lots of differences, such as the role in the society, the guarantee of the fact, the knowledge of the functionaries. Above all, justice is independence to all, to media; the case will be a hand down story.Although the contradiction between them, supervision is important. Not only is a way to guarantee the fairness, but also make the principle public to all. Supervision doesn' t always means impartial, a block sometimes.These days court is well praised for the open policy, especially to the media. But dispute between them is not news. Some out - of -courtroom statements disturbed the impartial judgments. In this thesis will touch upon "the judgments of the media" and TV broadcast on air during an opening court.USA is well known for its media. How to coordinate the freedom of report and fairness of the judgments is valuable to us all. The contempt of court is powerless now. Nowadays, not just focus on protesting the interest of the court and judge, but privilege of the defendants. In British, Any misleading statement will be forbidden, the punishment will be restrict report, the contempt of cornt, the reason of appeal and so on. In Japan, the statement of a case just base on judicial precedent, orit break law.In our country legislation news report is right ahead of us. The author of this thesis considers that standard the pattern, range of supervises must be set in it. Media play a role not only in supervisor but also in safeguard of the impartial judgment.