| With the implememtation of the New Curriculum Reform, learning plan has been popular. In the view of great many educational experts and teachers, compared with the traditional teaching based on teaching plan, learning plan guided learning guides students to study actively. More importantly, it can better reflect the following teaching concepts of ’learner-centered’and’students’subjective status’.However, as a new product, with lack of theoretical research and some practical problems, learning plan has been doubted and even rejected. So has Geography learning plan in high school.Teachers should make attempts, do some theoretical research, make innovations and form correct opinions instead of following others.As an important learning carrier, compilation of learning plan can directly show the teachers’teaching philosophy, various restrictions in the course of teaching, especilly sudents’learing methods, interaction and teaching effects. In order to achieve a better effect, teachers should first produce efficient learning plan. Firstly, through documets, the paper reviews some previous and recent researches on compilation of learning plan both at home and abroad, and further summarizes the general procedure, strategies, problems and approches. Meanwhile, after theoretical analysis, some relative concepts are defined, which are used as the theoretical basis ofGeography learning plan.This research employs questionnaires and interviews to survey teachers and students and collects their evaluations of the learning plan, thus knowing about the situation of writing Geography learning plan in high school and collecting problems and teacher’s prososals on improvement.Accordingly, some strategies for improvement have been put forward:correcting comprehension, defining principles, optimizing the design of the content, perfecting assessing standards, standardizing management and increasing teachers’subjective initiatives. Some strategies have been proved based on the experimental research on improving strategies.Lastly, the author points out some defects in the paper and discusses the outlook for future research. |