A Comparative Study On The Application Effect Of The Second Team Of The Six First Team Of Chinese Women 's Volleyball League In 2012-2013

With the continuous improvement of technical level and volleyball rules, online strengthcompetition to become the important perfecting of competition strength, it propose higher andhigher demands of the setter’s technology application. The Chinese women’ s volleyball league isthe highest level competition in China, the technical level of the main setter in this competitionshowed the highest form of our country, after the17th session of women’ s volleyball league,Tianjin team became the "nine crown", this result has inevitable connection with its main setter’stechnology. This paper use the method of documents and materials, expert interview method,video observation method, mathematical statistics, etc, for the comparative analysis of Tianjinteam and top six teams’ main setter’s technical application in2012-2013Chinese women’ svolleyball league, to find Tianjin team and top six teams’ main setter’s effect of technologyapplication, the comparative analysis of advantages and disadvantages, and provide referencefor later the cultivation of the setter. The results of the study are as follows:1. Tianjin team’s setter is upper and middle level on the height, weight, age, online height, etc. inthe top six teams, not absolute advantage.2. All the teams’ setters of top six team are both use jump set primarily and standing setauxiliary.The Tianjin team main’s setter on the back of the pass ratio is higher than the top sixteams.3. On the effect of serve and the second ball, Tianjin team’s setter is better than the top six teams’setter. The block effect of Tianjin team’s setter and the top six teams’ setters is almost equal.4. The attack area of the main setter’s organization:Tianjin team mainly in no.4area, the secondis no.2area, the top six teams mainly in no.4area, the second is no.3area; The setters organizethe back row attacks mainly in no.6area, the second is no.1area.Tianjin team’s main setter has abetter effect in the area of no.3and no.2than the top six teams’ setter, and worse in the area ofno.1and no.6.5. The setters of Tianjin team, Zhejiang team and Shanghai team organize attracts with fastoffence primarily and power attack auxiliary. The other three teams’ setters organize attracts withpower attack primarily and fast offence auxiliary.6. The organization of fast offence: There have no big difference on the organization rate of thefront lab row attack; Tianjin team is slightly higher than the top six teams on the adjust attackorganization rate, Tianjin team’s setters is slightly lower than the top six teams’ on the back rowattack organization rate; The entirety organization of fast offence effect is not the dominant ofTianjin team’s setter.7. The organization fast offence: Tianjin team is higher than the top six other teams on theorganization rate of self cover fast ball, including organization of self cover back fast ball is Tianjin team’s characteristics; It is similar between Tianjin and the top six teams’ setters on fastball cover attacks’ organization rate; Tianjin team’s main setter is lower than the top six teams’setters on flat fast ball’s organization rate. On the organization of fast offence’s effect, Tianjinteam’s setter is better than the top six others teams’ setters.