Comparative Analysis Of The New Curriculum Reform After The Mainland College Entrance Examination Volume And Hong Kong Diploma Volume

In recent years, mainland China and Hong Kong have carried out a reform of the new curriculum. In 2004, a new high school curriculum reform in the Mainland. In 2009, Hong Kong’s implementation of the new high school academic.With the curriculum reform, the entrance examination is also on the agenda, and gradually implemented. Compared with the previous, two papers appeared with change. Mainland entrance gradually adopt "New Standard Volume", while Hong Kong launched a new entrance examination-"Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education Examination." Mainland and Hong Kong have the same cultural history and customs. Because both the historical background, social system and cultural habits, so there are significant differences in the papers. Chinese history questions in this article analyzes the entrance examination. II selected papers are:2010 to 2014, the National New Curriculum volume of mainland Chinese history questions; from 2012 to 2014, the Hong Kong Diploma of Chinese history exam papers. I hope to learn about the advantages of Hong Kong and selected topics to write historical data, can be the subject at the time of writing exercises and exams set of propositions to provide ideas for the discipline of history propositions mainland group. While for high school students to answer, master knowledge, answer techniques provide a new perspective.This paper is divided into two parts:The first part introduces the main contents of the course of development of the Mainland and Hong Kong, the entrance examination and the basic situation of the new curriculum, based on analysis of the examination, the examination time, paper structure and the proportion of Chinese history in two papers in the papers, etc., concluded two History and examination papers similarities and differences.The second part, the questions comparing the two papers and assess the same knowledge of the standard system contrast. This section is divided into three points, the first point to compare the two historical questions, mainly from the papers of value, structure, questions, similar to other aspects of the test sites were compared; the second point two historical questions difficulty coefficient comparison The main references of the relevant information in the Mainland Ministry of Education and Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority issued compare; the third point of the two historical questions marking criteria analysis highlights two marking standard features.This paper aims to compare the results and recommendations of both teachers and scholars introduced to the mainland for reference, with a strong practical significance.