Font Size: a A A

The Xining Government Dosanjh "kaifeng Chi Comparative Study

Posted on:2012-05-14Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:H W LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2215330368993283Subject:Chinese classical literature
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
As the development of local record were affected by the political guide and the local government's opinion and the group of the editor and the development law of the record itself, the finish of the historical change can turned out to be complicated. the chronicle of Qing dynasty experienced a course of shifting from central to the marginal and from group compiling to sole compiling, from compiling to writing . Following is the comparative analysis of the culture between central and western areas, the agricultural civilization and the Confucianism rooted in HeHuang area during the process of unity. At the same time, the HeHuang area maintained its uniqueness of geographical style and appearance. The two records have significant value in the course of cultural comparison and penetrationThe first chapter begins with the causes of the local records, the process, the aspects of the finished book, the circulation of different editions and the lives and their works of the author, in this way to devote to the revivification of the two records. Guanjiezhong revised the"chronicle of Kaifeng county"and Zhangmu compiled it in 1695( 34thyear of theKangxi emperor) Qing dynasty. Yangyingju compiled and revised the"new chronicle of Xining county"in 1747(12th year of the Chien-Lung emperor)Qing dynasty. The two are representative records of central plains and the western aera in Qing dynasty, both of them were compiled by famous figures and includes 40 volumes. Recorded the history of construction, the territory of the county, the hills and the mountains, the customs and cultures, the cities , the flood control of the rivers, the social organizational system, the registered residence, and the taxing of the fields, the local products etc. in detail about Xining and Kaifeng respectively.The second chapter compared the characteristic of the above mentioned local records in depth. After serious research this paper hold that: although the"chronicle of Kaifeng county"showed a typical old faction of character, the tendency recording as the history can be manifested in the bound of its inherent of scheme, the edict and the instant finishing ,thus there's character of new school to be perfected. As to the"new chronicle of Xining county", it implemented the philosophy of"recoding as the history"perfectly even it is 20 years earlier than the initial practices of Zhangxuecheng, the elegant talents of the author can be reflected in its layouts, contents and languages all in this chronological book. Although Its practice of a historian is not the most bold and thorough, its very complete and conscious. The most unique character of the"new edition of Xining county record"is its pursuit of the entirety of a local record as a book.The third chapter carry out a further discussion and summary of the two local records on its developed pattern of the early Qing dynasty.Henan is the first province official organized compliment of local records, and the quantity amounts to be the third place all over the country whereas Qinghai is the contrary. In this end, there are two totally different local records, enough to provide some worthy trails to quest into the law of the local records during Kangxi and Qian-lung period. This paper was to explore a possibility of comparative research between local records of different area and different age.
Keywords/Search Tags:new chronicle of Xining county, chronicle of Kaifeng county, comparative research, value assessment
PDF Full Text Request
Related items