| With the rural land transfer putting into practice on a large scale, the related topics have also drawn the attention of academics. In many forms of the rural land transfer,"FanZu DaoBao" is innovative but controversial in academic circles. The main reason is that in the development process, the village committee always appears to turn from a guest into a host, seek rent and infringe farmer's right of land contract. As a result, this institution has been forbidden by central government. However,"FanZu DaoBao" is still on stage in many local areas, then in the process of rural land transfer, farmer committee,cultivate large farmer, three party relationship is how, is how to carry out the action? whether the "FanZu DaoBao" under dispute is a common mode to realize scale management? what conditions it needs?This paper selects "FanZu DaoBao"as the object of study, with the purpose of empirically researching the concrete practice process of "FanZu DaoBao". This study believes that"FanZu DaoBao"involves interests of the village committee, contract large farmer and the common peasants. The paper specially draws attention on the choice for action of the benefit body. It is not simply a top-down mandatory product of the township government and village collective, but the result of three power.By comparation of "FanZu DaoBao" in the end of90s and in the new time, the author think "FanZu DaoBao" as a way to realize scale is feasible, but it needs certain conditions, especially to respect the wishes of farmers and not blindly advance,. Since the academics have shown their concerns, such as the village committee infringing the land contracts rights of the farmer, seeking rent.But peasants in this village have shown their wisdom, and formed the prevention mechanism, which solved these problems. They avoided the village committee to turn from a guest into a host, and finally maintained their dominant position in land transfer.At first, this article presents the significance of research and the background of case village. The first chapter analyzes the background of "FanZu DaoBao" in the first round, the necessity of regular land adjustment, the limitations of land fragment, and the reason for failure in the "FanZu DaoBao" process; The second chapter presents the choice facing X village at the turn of the century. Increased access to work makes land ideas of the villagers have some change, The flowing village starts to spontaneously transfer their land; The third chapter shows the game between the village farmers, large contract farmer and common peasants in the process of "FanZu DaoBao" in this new century, then summarizes the constraint conditions; The conclusion part, analyzes the effect of the practice of "FanZu DaoBao", responses various kinds of disputes on the "FanZu DaoBao". |