Popper Historic Decision On The Criticism Of Anti-critical

On the criticism of several representatives of the beginning of historical determinism in the article first by the meaning of the history of historicism several classification and Popper defined determinism and Popper leads Popper on the critique of historical determinism foothold andtheoretical support, and finally the analysis of the historical development of law and its realization of analysis and problems of Popper’s critique of historical determinism.To study historical determinism we must first study the history of doctrine, historical determinism is the development of historicism from Popper is the basis of historicism to carry out the criticism of the Marxist historical determinism. The historicism try to understand the past and the past system and beliefs, trying to grasp the ideological and historical development of the inevitable human history rational. Marxism is the Marxism Popper historicism as defined in historical determinism.Popper critical of Plato’s philosophy on the absolute idea of Hegel, Marx and holism. Popper considered that if the historical determinism of historical prophecy in the later history of reality to achieve, it will lead to totalitarianism. He believes that historical prophecy for the purpose of historical determinism hazards.Popper is undeniable that a philosophy of science master, made a great contribution to the development of science and philosophy, especially his natural science research in critical rationalism and falsificationism methodology proposed empiricism had a greatchallenges. But in the methodology of natural science applied to social science research come to the history of erratic, history can not predict the anti-historical determinism of thought it is not very wonderful.Reading of Popper’s ideas, we can conclude that:Popper’s critique of historical determinism is the critical of the materialist conception of history of Marxism. On representatives of far-fetched argument on the history of Plato, Hegel and Marx decided to attempt to explain the historical development is the no law at all and can not predict the history of development. The basic reason is the misunderstanding of his materialist conception of history is not a dialectical view of Marx’s historical materialism, Marx’s historical determinism distorted religious mysticism fatalism and mechanistic. Objective analysis of Popper’s philosophy, not only saw his deficiencies, but also see his contribution to political philosophy and practical significance.