The Young Writer’s Subjectivity Development

Recent literature study circles seem to be more and more attention and concern of "Youth","Youth","adolescence" writing research．As sociology, psychology, cultural studies in the age of referent，role consciousness, cultural and other important concepts," Youth" and" Youth " one word is being used orextending to the literature research field of each child．Especially since entering the new era, with the "generation" and" after " concept has spread to them, named for the various phenomena has been placed in aseries of urgent theoretical arguments and even social problems in core position．In this debate, teenage"post-80s " is the focus of the focus．Should say this on the " post-80s " controversy, from2004since, as aresult of numerous media reports, various cultural and social participation, has become a major mediaevent．This event is the initiator of evil, a magazine （" budding"）, race（a new concept race）, a group ofyoung writers（Han Han, Song jingru, Liu Jiajun）．To2004," post-80s " writing collective surfaced,scholars of the debate was experienced roughly one from aphasia to noisy gradually aphasia after transientprocess, praise, is a large area of the doubt and negation of sound．But regardless of the criticism of" youngwriters" works show how judgments（Literary feast or beat writing）, how to make judgment（positive,negative, or waitting），are in fact the young writers of the germinal and influence, much to the critics andthe relevant academic prediction．It reflects the academia has been on young writers creation of neglect, foryoung writers subjectivity research is not enough. On the other hand, because of the neglect leads to thetheoretical construction of weak（according to this collection, still less to see this research data）and relatedliterature production mechanism is not mature, the young writers in writing at the beginning because ofrelative lack of proper guidance and easily subject to political or economic literature peripheral factors. Tocritics, the lack of theory leads to is a direct result of young writers creative comments and guidance of thelag and flawless performance．In fact, the academia to young writers creation perennial aphasia, is understandable, hand of youngwriters creation because " post-80s " exit only gradually to be noticed. On the other hand, young writersworks do not form a historical development vein. But this does not mean that today’s " post-80s " creationis no history of previous referent was born. Instead the " post-80s " some misunderstandings in the study of the split and its history is one of the" young" this particular appellation relationship．Since Liang Qichaowill" young" and" China" put together," Youth" spirit of reality has become China’s modernity process aninner driving force (how to become the internal driving force will be discussed in the introduction). Whilethe young writers creation and different power relations, in fact it is this passion "Youth" spirit and differentcountries with different manifestation of ideology and power．So today young writer ’s creation and"market" is not only not antagonistic, but before the" Youth" and revolution, and the national ideology, andthe spirit of the enlightenment in modern development process of the continuation of the results. Then thethought background refracted into contemporary youth writers subjectivity development problem, bymeans of literature production mechanism is the most basic elements, magazine, and through its subjectthinking, not only can pivot in different cultural and historical context of young writers creation main bodychanges, can the study of young writers creation in the contemporary literature and Modernity between theinner logic, in order to reflect the has been the mainstream of literary history screening of young writerscreation development of " history" feature．So this thesis based on the best embodies the characteristics of the young writers creation" budding"magazine (1956-2006), to the " spirit of youth" and modern Chinese spirit of Association for the innerleads to modernity, in different contexts in different development path as the era background, based on thedevelopment of subjectivity, to covered the dominant ideology, class stand and the mechanism of literaryproductions, downward adhesion readers. So this paper will from these four factors to study, because thesefour elements constitute the production and dissemination of just the simple cycle. From four elements ofthis interaction, perhaps to outline the young writers subjectivity complex evolution process．This paper is divided into five parts: the introduction part, firstly introduce the related concepts:"Youth"," spirit of youth"," young writers," subjectivity". Followed by the introduction of" Youth" spirit andChinese modernity spirit relation. Finally introduces the object, meaning, value, research and researchmethods. Part of the text in accordance with the" budding" magazine publication policy changes and thedevelopment of contemporary literature, divided into four main parts．The first chapter (1956-1966),chapter second (1981-1989), chapter third (1990-1998), chapter fourth (1999-2006) and each chapter in"sprout" and ideology (national ideology, ideology, modern market ideology), and young writers, andreaders, respectively discuss each development period, young writers subjectivity in ideology, literary context, the power structure inherent changes in evolution, to comprehensive, dynamic, specific shows andvarious elements of the complex interactions between． This evolution in general, there are twocharacteristics, each stage has its own horizontal development, namely the young writer ’s subjectivity inthe subject to different external digestion at the same time, also in another dimension reconstruction, so thedigestion process is actually the process of the reconstruction of. And between the phases and presentprogressive dialectical development in depth, i.e. between three stages with modernity and reflectivemodernity and commercialize between development change already present across time and spaceisomorphism also appeared new heterogeneity. The contents of the body in order to practice level, namelyfrom the production, dissemination, consumption of the overall relationship, the young writers subjectivityevolution intrinsic trajectories, and by " budding" in the90’s literary production mechanism in theimportant role of transition, perspective of journals in the literary field, economic field, political field in thegame to play roles and role. The fifth chapter is the conclusion, through a path analysis, attempts tosummarize a bypass many of the complex phenomenon of literature, and from economy, politics, culture torestrict a relation to understand the market economy and the relationship between literature and evaluate thepresent young writers creation phenomenon new thinking, new perspective and new method．...