The Effect Of Marxists In The Controversy Between Metaphysics And Science

In this paper, I research the background and process of the controversy and focuses onthe effect of Marxist in controversy which show the the dissemination of Marxism and criticalmetaphysics and science.Though introspection controversy between metaphysics andscience,the paper Discusses about the Marxist on outlook on life, breakthrough of scienceand the humanities and the relationship of Chinese traditional philosophy and Westernphilosophy.Part one discusses the controversy between metaphysics and science. I analysecontroversies background from the era and cultural. After the First World War,countries werebusy in recovery and relaxed aggression against China. At the same time, domestic capitalisteconomy development to a certain extent. In the cultural, Western began to reflect the materialcivilization after the First World War. In the "Western Learning, cultural prosperity anddevelopment. the paper will divided Controversy process into two stages.In the first stage,Controversies origin. In1923years, Zhang Junmai’s speech discussed the various issues inTHU.The point was the science doesn’t work for the outlook on life which is free. DingWenjiang criticized this view, thinking science is to guide the outlook on life. Then,controversy erupted formally.The scientific school and metaphysical school published articlesshow the view. In the scond stage, the controversy deepened.The science and outlook on lifepublished.Hu Shi and Chen duxiu wrote a preface for the book who discussed the outlook oflife and materialist historical view.Chen duxiu as the the third stream came on stageformally.In the late controversy,Qu Qiubai and Deng Zhongxia published articles inmaterialistic dialectics and united front of the controversy.Part two selective analysis the effect of marxists in the controversy. Early marxistcriticized the metaphysical school’s idealism. Chen duxiu explained the foundation of outlookon life, so as to prove view of the outlook on life completely free is wrong. At the sametime,Chen Duxiu criticized metaphysical school’s wrong ideas about science thoughillustrateing social science that is also has the scientific. Marxist early in the attitude toscientific school was part of agree, but at the same time to criticized the wrong idea. Chen duxiu had obviously relized scientific school science limited, whose essence was empirical.At the same time, a marxist criticized the narrow-mindedness of the scientific school.Theyalso further showed scientific school in social are idealist.As the early marxist criticized themetaphysical school’s idealism spread Marxism. The early Marxist specified with therelationship between historical materialism and outlook on life, explained Hu Shi’s questionson the historical materialism, and the social objective material research, the change of societyprogram. Qu Qiubai analysed controversies problems from the point of the materialistdialectics view, which was attack on the other side of Marxist.Part three contemporary thought the effect of Marxist in controversy.Though the outlookon life question is the core of the controversy, early Marxists’s discussion of Marxistphilosophy is not detailed. Marxist outlook on life is closely related with the standpoint ofpractice,.This article discuss the content of the Marxist from outlook on life from the essenceof life, value of life, ideal and goal of life, free of life. In the controversy, scientific spirit andhumanistic spirit was the opposite.Marxist’s understanding of the problem was insufficient. Incontemporary,science and humanities spirit should be higher level of breakthrough under thispurpose of the all-round development of people in Marxist.This article probe the method of fusing between scientific spirit and cultural spirit,suchas breaking the thinking mode of opposites, cultivating penetration the environment, enhancescience education and the humanities education.The controversy between metaphysics andscience is a battle of ideas. At present, Marxist philosophy face the problem of therelationship between other philosophy. The author’s point of view is to strengthen the dialoguebetween Chinese Traditional Philosophy western philosophy and Marxist philosophy for thepurpose of development Marxist philosophy.