An Experiment Study On The Impact Of Reward Rule, Achievement Goal And Word Relevance To Judgment Of Learning For Grade6Children

Judgments of learning (JOLs) are one of the most important forms of prospectivemonitory. It is a predictive judgment that individual predicts items performance in the futureand those items have been learned. Rank and accuracy are not only the main research index ofJOL but also the emphasis of the JOL research. JOL according to its predictive judgment timeare divided into immediate JOL and delayed JOL.Memorizing motivation is the important influence factor on primary school Children’sobject memory. Reward that provides not only the information of behavior but also the valueof behavior is one of the most important means to stimulate students’ learning motivation, soit has important value on information aspect. Different reward rule transfer differentinformation. Achievement goal is social cognitive representation that plays a decision role onndividual’s cognition and behavior. The reason, meaning and purpose to individual learninginvolve in it. Different Achievement goals lead to different motivation, feeling and cognition.So this research think that the reward rule and the achievement goal which influentobject-level may influent meta-level judgment. At the same time word relevance may influentthis judgment.In view of the above, study by2×3×2mix design, selected grade6children asparticipants, chose two word Chinese characters concrete noun word pairs as experimentalmaterials. The results as follows:1. Reward rule had prominent influence on grade6children’s JOLs: whether immediateJOL or delayed JOL the subjects under internal reward got higher JOL judgment ranks, JOLaccuracy and recall performance than those under eternal reward.2. Achievement goal had prominent influence on grade6children’s JOLs: whetherimmediate JOL or delayed JOL the JOL judgment ranks, JOL accuracy and recallperformance accorded to the order of participants with mastery goal orientation, participantswith performance-approach goal orientation and participants performance-avoidance goalorientation gradually reduced.3. Word association had prominent influence on grade6children’s JOLs: whetherimmediate JOL or delayed JOL the subjects on words with relevance got higher JOLjudgment ranks, JOL accuracy and recall performance than those on words without relevance.4. Reward rule and word relevance had interactive influence on the grade6children’simmediate JOL ranks and delayed JOL ranks: whether under internal reward or under eternalreward participants’ JOL judgment ranks on words with relevance were higher than those onwords without relevance. Two levels of reward rule had significant difference on words with relevance. Participants under internal reward got higher performance than those under eternalreward. There was no significant difference on words without relevance.5. Achievement goal and word relevance had interactive influence on the grade6children’s immediate JOL judgment ranks, immediate JOL accuracy, recall performance anddelayed JOL judgment ranks: three levels of achievement goal had significant difference ontwo levels of word relevance. Participants’ immediate JOL judgment ranks, immediate JOLaccuracy, recall performance and delayed JOL judgment ranks on words with relevance gothigher than those on words without relevance.6. Reward rule and achievement goal had interactive influence on the grade6children’srecall performance of immediate JOL: three levels of achievement goal on two levels ofreward rule, recall performance accorded to the order of participants with mastery goalorientation, participants with performance-approach goal orientation and participantsperformance-avoidance goal orientation gradually reduced. Reward rule had significantdifference on both level of mastery goal and level of performance-avoidance goal. Recallperformance under internal reward got higher than those under eternal reward under bothlevel of mastery goal and level of performance-avoidance goal. Reward rule was nosignificant difference on level of performce-approach goal.7. Reward rule, achievement goal and word relevance had interactive influence on thegrade6children’s immediate JOL judgment ranks.8. Delayed effect appeared on grade6children.