The Comparison Of Organizaiton Construction Between The Communist Party And KMT During The Period Of Democratic Revolution

As the two major political parties in modern China, the contest between Kuomintang andthe Communist Party become the theme of political and military struggle. However, the finalendings of the two parties make us deeply in thought, the party which control almost of statepower and social resources just 28 years, eventually defeated by mainland , we have to considerthe deeper reasons behind.With the era of party politics arrives and the continuous development of political parties, thetheory about party and party building is getting more and more mature, the party organizationbuilding is an important part of party building. The two parties have started their ownorganization construction since their establishments. In 1921-1949, the two parties stick to theirown organization construction, but the results are different, the Kuomintang organization powerfrom strong to weak, organizations at the grass-roots level but also exist in name only; Thecommunist party of Chinese organization strengths from weak to strong, forming a tightbasic-level organization nets, which provides the solid organizational guarantee to win to thebattle. Specifically, The patry did better In the aspects of the leader organization interposition,democratic centralism, Party cadre system construction, historical development of contingent ofthe Party members, army building of party organizations, and through the democratic centralismflexible use of that system to the implementation of the powerful and carry out, the hugeorganization to play the power; The Kuomintang and CPC are all set up similar organizationconstruction system and method, but the Kuomintang authoritarian leader factional struggle, theconstruction system of the party is hard to implement, plus the Kuomintang party Israeli forces,severely weakened party organization authority, local party organization to completelysubservient to the army, difficult to play its role.The KMT and the CPC organization construction all imitate the Soviet Union, imitate the Soviet Union founding mode, so the two parties has a considerable similarity in the organization set, the KMT and the CPC have been established set of strict organizational system from central to local, the central organization of the two parties set up basically the same, and have paid attenti on to the ideological construction to strengthen the organizational construction; However, the two parties have more different points, the Chinese Communists overall Russia and in accordancewith Chinese national conditions continuous improvement of its construction, strictly implementdemocratic centralism, struggle against the ultra-democracy tendencies and the leaders of authoritarian; establish party-military system to ensure that the army has always been the role of the execution of the tasks of the Party; the Chinese Communists vigorously the development of primaryunderground organization, form the underground organization net throughout the country, and laid a solid organizational foundation for the victory. KMT abandon the Soviet Union founding model of democratic centralism to develop into leader dictatorship, the prevalence of the concept ofarmy rule the party, especially in the construction of grass-roots Party organizations, the KMT grassroots organizations exist in name only, these differences finally led to the two party organizations different results.