The Democratic Progressive Party (dpp) Continental Policy Development And Impact Study

DPP’s mainland policy refers to the development of cross-strait relations and Taiwan on the future direction of view, the policy in general. Since September1986after the establishment of the DPP. DPP’s mainland policy has to adjust. From the initial "self-determination" advocated "Taiwan’s status is undetermined" to the Democratic Progressive Party formally proposed "Taiwan independence" Democratic Progressive Party Chairman Tsai Ing-wen made until the recent cross-strait relations,"and with a different" point of view, the DPP has not give up the "independent state" ideas, has never recognized the "one China" principle, but with the ruling status and governance situation and the international environment is different from the radical to the gradual approach, from dominant to the invisible. Although the DPP has lost its ruling position, becoming the opposition party, unable to dominate the cross-strait relations, but its still the island’s southern cities and counties to govern, to still have a high rate of public support in future elections in Taiwan still possible to obtain the ruling position, these factors determine its mainland policy is still the KMT authorities, public opinion toward Taiwan, especially in central and southern Taiwan people’s views on cross-strait relations had a significant impact, is still to some extent affect the peaceful cross-strait relations development. DPP became the largest development of cross-uncertainty, therefore, the DPP’s mainland policy for the system of rational analysis and comparative study for the peaceful development of cross-strait relations to promote the deepening, curb "Taiwan independence" forces in the development, to explore solutions to Taiwan practical approach to the problem has important practical and theoretical significance.This extensive collection of information and draw on existing research results, based on the principle of historical materialism to follow, adhere to strict scientific approach, the integrated use of literature, comparative studies, value analysis, conflict analysis and other methods, trying to review the DPP history of the mainland policy starting from the DPP reviewed the development of start-up period to the present changes in the macro on the DPP’s mainland policy in different periods were compared, summed up the DPP’s mainland policy at this stage the specific content and characteristics. From the island, mainland and international analysis of three aspects of the DPP’s mainland policy changes that affect the impact factor. Then, according to the island’s political situation changes, the author outlines five aspects of Taiwan’s ruling DPP’s mainland policy authorities to contain a specific approach, the DPP’s mainland policy of the governing authorities on Taiwan cross-strait policies, draw the DPP and the KMT’s mainland policy convergence conclusions. Finally, according to the DPP’s mainland policy variable and not variable, the DPP’s mainland policy for the future development trends and the impact of future development of cross-strait relations and made basic judgments, and proposed five strategies to promote the transformation of the DPP.According to the article, with Taiwan’s political parties continue to mature, the DPP and the KMT’s mainland policy convergence trend emerged, but the decision because the DPP party platform, which could not possibly abandon the "Taiwan independence" idea, but its also can not but accept the reality of deepening cross-strait exchanges, so the most likely adjustment is vague on the issue of sovereignty treatment, in the economic and cultural exchanges with the KMT’s mainland policy is consistent. However, to actually change its "Taiwan independence", the island from the impact of public opinion, the use of the contradictions within the DPP, the DPP consortium concerned about trends in support of the island, the four think tanks actively engaged in promoting the Green Camp DPP to abandon the "Taiwan independence "concept, to accept the one China principle, to achieve a political transformation.