A Study On The Connotation And Path Of Sociology Indigenization

In February1931, in the first annual meeting of Chinese Sociology Community, Sun Benwen explicitly used the sociological concept of "sinicize", and, in particular emphasized "the building of the sociology of sinicize" to be one of the four "basic work" for Chinese sociology in the future. The speech of Sun Benwen opened a chapter of the history of sociology indigenization movement in China. Today, sociology indigenization movement in China has owned an80-year history, there is also a basic consensus on the study of indigenization, and its sign is the formation of the discipline indigenization theory of Zheng Hangsheng. But both the status quo of the sociological study in domestic, and the international sociology pattern, force us to re-examine the sociology indigenization.In the current academic environment,"indigenization" is a term which has not yet formed a consensus and has not been widely used, scholars still intermixes "sinicize","Chinese characteristics","indigenization" or "sociology of people" to extend for their academic feelings. Its implication shows a variety of form with researchers’purport, however on the dimension "what is the normal formulas of the sociology", these appellations with great individuality actually have the nature of identity, and such identity gets real full phanerosis in pointing out the danger and the road for the development of sociology. The study adopts the reference to "indigenization", in order to be able to dig out the original meaning from the object of the study.The study views indigenization as the discipline viewpoint refers to the sociology, and probes indigenization on the whole level of the sociology. The study suggests that in the study of the indigenization of sociology, the connotation of the sociology indigenization is the concentrated expression of the viewpoint of the indigenization of sociology. On this basis, this study examines the most representative connotation of sociology indigenization in the literature. The study finds that they are talking about the mainland against the other, talking about the indigenization on the basis of mainland. The essence of this indigenization viewpoint is a kind of "in-out" viewpoint, or "introduction-output", or "turn out after input". The viewpoint of "turn out after input" emphasizes on the combination of the reasonable composition of the alien sociology (especially Western Sociology) and local realities, enhances the knowledge and application of the sociology in Chinese mainland, and forms sociological theory, methods with local characteristics. And, the viewpoint of "turn out after input" suggests that we should firstly enter inside the alien sociology, survey its inner development logic and theoretical line of reasoning, then take a look at what a unique contribution we can make with our own cultural superiority for it, the test standard of the success of the sociology indigenization is that how much the cultural characteristics and nationality of China in sociology is.The viewpoint of the sociology indigenization of talking about the mainland against the other, either falls into the plight of fore structure of using it for oneself as in the viewpoint of "introduction-output", or is difficult to get rid of the petty and low mind-set before the viewpoint of "turn out after input" and takes the sociology as the center. This study takes the understanding of philosophical hermeneutics as the perspective, regards the mainland as the integral and indivisible mixture blending with the other, and defines the indigenization of sociology as the perfect tropism taking sociology as a clue and based on the local internal drive. In this sense, the indigenization of sociology takes orientation as its essential attribute, with mainland internal driving force as the driving force, to achieve a perfect-good sociological goal. This indigenization viewpoint highlights the two fundamental purport of this study, which are the completely individual practicalness beyond the population request and to win back the theoretical concern of the primary research of taking originality as the fundamental feature.In the perspective of the two fundamental purports, the path of the indigenization of sociology in this study is bound to be rendered as "returning to one’s own nature, presenting the true meaning of the world in the presentation". On the solid foundation of the ontological proof of the existence of one’s own nature, this study, starting from the field of view of holographic theory and structuralism mythology, interprets one’s own nature as the holographic deep structure which has the same constructive relationship with the phan. Due to the same constructive relationship between the phan and one’s own nature, returning to one’s own nature is not back to a truer place behind the phan, returning to one’s own nature is back to the phan. The phan, precipitating one’s own nature and formed by one’s own nature, produced the alienation because of his own operation—beteromorphism. So returning to the phan, is the returning of heteromorphism to the phan, is the reflection of phan like what the phan is. Returning to one’s own nature is from the perspective of the relationship between heteromorphism and the phan, its content is presenting the truth of the world in the presentation, the thorough presentation of the things in correlation. In this presentation, people and the world present the truth of the world under the guidance of the Q&A logic, the indigenization of sociology was also realized with the truth of the world presenting.