| In the ATP world masters tournament2011season, when peoplethink rafael nadal do not beat, but djokovic in the final five station beat, make academiacan not no longer a technology to two people in the style of the review, in order to graspthe difference between the two techniques and tactics. This paper adopts literature datamethod, interview method, video observation and statistics and logic analysis to2011years and rafael nadal djokovic in wimbledon game at different stages in getting pointsand scoring rate, tactics, receiving way serve tactics, serve attack after attack tactics,receiving tactics, bottom line, nets volley tactics stalemate tactics,3and4shoot stageand the stalemate stage analyzed the technique. The results found that the success rateon the sniper djokovic below rafael nadal, but the one on the offensive than rafael nadaland one win rate and the second serve win rate, djokovic is higher than the rafael nadaland serve mainly in Germany about placement opponent backhand and outside, position,rafael nadal serve placement mainly concentrated in the inside, high success rate, butthe offensive is low. Djokovic in two hair of stability and offensive to the best balancebetween seek, Angle of choice is more volatile than rafael nadal, no matter one or twonadal in hair are adopting an internal Angle serve; One and two hair of win rate ondjokovic is higher than the nadal; The winner and the errors, djokovic is higher than therafael nadal and djokovic winner in the main through the ACE ball, powerful forehandvolley and nets composed; Two players all belong to the attacking players, but djokovicoffensive than rafael nadal; The high level player to score the main way baselinersstalemate stage is given priority to, followed by service, receiving stage, and finally thethird,4shoot stage. Sums up the more the practical techniques and tactics. Designed fortennis full-scale development tactics to provide the reference. |
PDF Full Text Request