Comparative Study Into City Community Sports Construction And Management Of Venties And Facilities Between Beijing And London

This article compare and analyse community sports construction and management of venuesand facilities between Beijing and London, divide the following respects: the concept of thecommunity sports facility construction, the policy of the community sports facilitiesconstruction, the way of investment about the community sports facilities construction, theconstruction standards of the community sports playgrounds and facilities, the othersupporting service facilities and configuration of the community sports facilities construction,the mode of management and operation about community sports facility. Through the methodof literature and material, the method of investigation on the spot, systematic analysis and themethod of comparison, on these aspects of systematic analysis and comparison, this articlesummarizes the advanced experience, finishing Beijing community sports facilities in thecurrent situation and problems in the management of the deficiency, to establish the perfectand more mature system of the construction, The fundamental solution to constructing thecommunity sports facility, In addition, summarizes the shortage of the management, build thesystem of community sports facilities mode of management and operation, improve theutilization rate of the venues, make it more reasonable.Through the comparative analysis, we can find that as a national capital, Beijing and Londonin the community sports development more advanced than the national, and also the similarityof the development process. The sports facilities in the community policy making, they frominsufficient attention to pay more and more attention to, make a special feasible constructionpolicy. But in the laws and regulations, lack of the policy about the mandatoryimplementation, that is the common problems of two cities. In the way of investment, most isto by national finance, the community construction developers, charity organization andsports lottery income, and the different is the proportion. In the standard, Beijing is mainly thecommunity divided according to the population, according to the different scale community,to give the construction of sports ground scale opinion, but for each of the types ofcommunity sports activities should be included in the place of the project and the project forthe standard and the sports activity places as a function of the need and have not givendetailed standards, and in construction planning, the right to play sports green area did not dothe rules. The city of London is the opposite. In supporting the service facilities, the Beijingmunicipal services mainly focus on community interior, but layout more decentralized, andnot around the sports facilities and the construction, the main service object is not just forsports community, but the whole community activities way. And the city of London, mostabout sports service facilities are concentrated in the community sports center, and in the community sports center outside, also has a variety of public and commercial service facilities.In the management and operation model, Beijing is mainly rely on the government, socialforces and community organizations participation is not high, on the management, can get aprofitable way is too little. The city of London management operation is through the forces ofcombination of government and society, community organizations involved in, it can profit bymany ways, its operating income almost can maintain their spending.