Interactive Development Between Producer Services And Manufacturing

Since the reform and opening up. China’s manufacturing industry has developed rapidly. However, the slow industrial structure, uneven regional development and weak international competitiveness of manufacturing industry are still here. Therefore, in the context of the current world economic development, the development of China’s producer services, especially advanced producer services for improving the international competitiveness of China’s manufacturing industry, upgrading China’s manufacturing industry, adjusting manufacturing industry’s structure and balancing regional development has an important significance. Because the development of producer services industries not only can change the quality of the manufacturing physical products, improve its production efficiency and increase its product’s value-added also contribute to upgrade and optimize the industrial structure of manufacturing industry. Producer services which spun off from manufacturing industry can promote the development of the manufacturing sector in turn after the time’s accumulation and the deepening of the labor’s social division. Producer services and manufacturing sectors are closely related, both showing the interactive trend of interdependence, mutual promotion and common development. On the one hand, the manufacturing sector provides a platform for the development of producer services; the other hand, the producer services provide the necessary services for the manufacturing sector s structural upgrading and competitiveness’s improve.This article summarizes the interactive relation between manufacturing sector and producer services from the perspective of global value chains. spatial structure, and interactive innovation. From the three angles, we can also see the close relationship between producer services and manufacturing. In this paper, according to the2007Chinese input-output tables, we calculate four indicators:the rate of intermediate demand, the rate of intermediate inputs, the sensitivity coefficient and the influence coefficient, and conduct a comprehensive analysis of the interactive relationship of manufacturing sector and two different growth mode of producer services.The following conclusions were drawn:the driving ability of producer services to manufacturing sector is weak in our country. Although its driving ability mainly concentrates in the differentiation-driven growth model, its driving ability is still less than the social leverage. The supporting role of producer services to manufacturing sector is small and concentrated in the cost-driven growth model. The supporting role of the differentiation-driven growth model is limited and also does not reach the average level of society.The article also conducts co-integration Analysis of the interaction between two styles producer services and manufacturing in different regions of China. Based on the co-integration regression model and data in1991-2010years, we analysis the different degree of interaction between Guangdong. Jiangsu, Henan, Hubei, Chongqing and Xinjiang provinces quantitatively. The following conclusions were drawn:Generally speaking the role of the cost-driven growth model to manufacturing industry must be greater than the differentiation-driven growth model. The growth in the cost-driven growth model is1%; the growth in manufacturing is more than1%. And the gap between the east and the Midwest region is not great. However, the growth in the differentiation-driven growth model is1%; the growth in manufacturing is lower than1%. And the gap between the east and the Midwest region is obvious:the growth elasticity in the eastern region is greater than the central area; the growth elasticity in the central region is greater than the west. Thus, we can see from this angle that the gap of our country’s manufacturing industry is mainly driven by the development gap of differentiation-driven growth model in different regions and the different interactive degree by the gap. Finally, on the basis of the earlier research, We put forward policy suggestions in our country to realize the interactive development of manufacturing industry and producer service, in order to narrow the gap between China’s manufacturing industry areas.