Research About The Writing Paradigm Of Chinese Contemporary Literature History Since The New Period

Since the new period, one symbol of the contemporary literature maturity is that the writing paradigm of contemporary literature history consummating constantly. This thesis will discuss those changes in contemporary literature history writing paradigm for more than thirty years from the angle of paradigm, it’s not only tease the history of literature subject, but also turn over to think many problems of contemporary literature, and the paper can reflects the changes of thoughts and culture in recent thirty years. This paper divided into five parts:In part one, first of all, the essay takes theoretical analysis and definition of some key words such as "new period","contemporary literature","the history of contemporary literature"and"paradigm", then the significance of the intellectual history, subject history, and literature history are summarized briefly. Secondly, the paper makes a simple review of existing research results from the angle of the discipline development and specific academic issues.The second part focuses on the origin and development of contemporary literary history writing paradigm since the new period. The writing of literature history can be traced back to the late Qing Dynasty, the history of literature writing is not mature enough, but after the formation of literary history writing paradigm provides a lot of experience and lessons. During the period of the Republic of the writing of literary history gradually formed a fixed pattern, which occupy the mainstream is the evolutionary history and pure literature view. The direct source of the writing of contemporary literature history is the contemporary history of literature writing practice during the period of seventeen years. The construction of this period of contemporary literary history writing paradigm, the first is the construction of contemporary literature "legitimacy" problem, which can be found from the history of Chinese contemporary literature symptomatic reading, by the historians of discourse strategies and new literature occurred when Hu Shi argues "New Literature" to replace the "legitimacy to run in the same groove old literature". On this basis, the contemporary literature history writing paradigm with the social history as its center at the period of seventeen years established formally. At the beginning of the new period "bring order out of chaos" thought makes the traditional paradigm of regression to the writing of contemporary literature history, the history of literature and ideology reflected was highly homogeneous traces, but also the reconstruction of the legitimacy of the contemporary literature and a "first step of classics". In the "eighty’s" cultural context, the aesthetic modernity, modernization, such as language constructs a set of complete knowledge system, and the impact of the old paradigm of contemporary literature history writing, the rise of "rewriting literary history". Which in1985had become an important point of contemporary literature? However, in the aesthetic paradigm of Beijing scholars and Shanghai scholars appeal of "Rewriting" is not entirely consistent, which also promote the diversified development of contemporary literary history writing.1980’s the rise of "culture" in the1990’s with the mass consumption culture in theory and research practice two respects had new development, contemporary literature also appeared to attempt to construct the cultural paradigm of literary history.The third part focuses on the new period of three kinds of Contemporary Literature History Paradigm their insight, prejudice, not see. First of all, the traditional historical center social paradigm in succession during the seventeen years of contemporary literature on writing tradition has many self innovations, but because of the writing is carried on under the guidance of ideology, there are also blind. In the text of aesthetic and modernity as the central paradigm has not be ignored historical contribution, it broke the old literature history pattern, in the "inward" background, the paradigm for and pay more attention to explore the literary texts for the study of the contemporary literature and literary history has opened a new space, at the same time it in practice. Various limitations, such as the history of literature influence, despise the text on the political ideology to alienation and to some extent neglected the unique in contemporary literary history and rich, but also can not be avoided. Cultural paradigms since1990, though not mature, but it marked the history of contemporary literature began writing paradigm transformation, but also reflects the breakthrough in the original material attributes might, the literary history of the concept of open, view of literary history is no longer confined to pure literature, of course, this paradigm has aesthetic suspension and the surface imbalance.The fourth part mainly discusses the new period change causes of contemporary literary history writing paradigm innovation and perfection and existing problems. The writing of contemporary literature history is closely related with the "change of contemporary literature", from the concept of the connotation, the relationship between pure literature and literature, the elegant literature and the popular literature, the mainstream literature and undercurrent literature in literary history is how to properly handle construct is a problem when generation have to face the history of literature; from extension of the concept of view, contemporary literature of the time range, spatial extent are related to changes in history of literature model. In terms of literary history writing paradigm, historical and literary history, literary history are the three basic dimensions, and the historical data is also affected by the first two dimensions constraints, it is in this sense, writing of contemporary literature history Chinese form, collation and research materials to literary history changes, which in turn influenced by it, at the same time historical data, also can enrich and improve the literary history. In the same time, since the new period of overseas Chinese in China can not be ignored. The aesthetic dimension of Xia Zhiqing, Sima Changfeng and other literary history of advertised; Tang Xiaobing, Huang Ziping domestic to overseas scholars to deconstruct the cultural dimension position; Wang Dewei, in Li Oufan’s academic research is the three dimensions of the main, it has expanded the view of Contemporary Mainland Chinese literature history writing, on the other hand, in practice, many problems exposed.The fifth part is the conclusion, on one hand to hold the humanities scholars in the "integrity innovation" under the banner of human feelings; on the other hand, in the practice of literary history writing, try to keep the constant change. Not only to "the history of contemporary literature" itself, pay attention to the historical and stability, not always empty value pursuit and interpretation of meaning; on the other hand, the contemporary literary scholars should also have their own unique historical vision and awareness of the problem.